Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug;40(4):832-841.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0706-9. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Pharmacovigilance in oncology

Affiliations
Review

Pharmacovigilance in oncology

Paolo Baldo et al. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background Side effects of cancer therapy are one of the most important issues faced by cancer patients during their illness. Pharmacovigilance, namely the science and activities aimed at monitoring the safety of drugs, is particularly important in oncology, due to the intrinsic biologic toxicity of antineoplastic agents, their narrow therapeutic windows, and the high doses and rigid timing of treatment regimens. Aim of the review To identify the main issues in carrying out an effective pharmacovigilance activity in oncology. Method We searched PubMed for articles about pharmacovigilance in relation to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy for cancer, using MeSH terms and text words. We also searched Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Micromedex, the Cochrane Library, two pharmacovigilance databases and the gray literature for articles published in 2012-2018. Overall, 137 articles were considered potentially relevant and were critically appraised independently by two authors, leading to the inclusion of 44 relevant studies, guidelines and reviews. Another 10 important research reports were included in the review. Results Eight critical issues of pharmacovigilance in oncology were identified. These issues pertain to: terminology; range of side effects; targeted therapy and immunotherapy; chemoradiotherapy; generic drugs and biosimilars; drug interactions, pharmacogenetics and polypharmacy; special patient categories; and under-reporting of ADRs. Conclusion The importance of pharmacovigilance in oncology must be highlighted with every effort, to improve safety and offer cancer patients every possible help to improve their quality of life during such a critical period of their lives.

Keywords: Adverse drug reactions; Cancer; Cytotoxic chemotherapy; Neoplasms; Oncology; Pharmacovigilance; Radiotherapy; Safety; Targeted therapy; Toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the selection of studies for this review

References

    1. Fornasier G, Francescon S, Leone R, Baldo P. An historical overview over pharmacovigilance. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0657-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuccori M, Montagnani S, Capogrosso-Sansone A, Mantarro S, Antonioli L, Fornai M, et al. Adverse reactions to oncologic drugs: spontaneous reporting and signal detection. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(1):61–75. - PubMed
    1. Lau PM, Stewart K, Dooley M. The ten most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in oncology patients: do they matter to you? Support Care Cancer. 2004;12(9):626–633. - PubMed
    1. Welcome to Netherlands pharmacovigilance centre Lareb [Internet]. https://www.lareb.nl/en/. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
    1. Oliveira JL, Lopes P, Nunes T, Campos D, Boyer S, Ahlberg E, et al. The EU-ADR Web Platform: delivering advanced pharmacovigilance tools. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(5):459–467. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources