Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;25(9):1306-1315.
doi: 10.1177/1352458518790397. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

Predicting the profile of increasing disability in multiple sclerosis

Affiliations

Predicting the profile of increasing disability in multiple sclerosis

Valentina Tomassini et al. Mult Scler. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Effective therapeutic strategies to preserve function and delay progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) require early recognition of individual disease trajectories.

Objectives: To determine the profiles of disability evolution, identify their early predictors and develop a risk score of increasing disability.

Methods: We analysed demographic, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from patients with relapsing MS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0-4.0 and follow-up ≥ 2 years. Attaining EDSS = 6.0 defined increasing disability; relapses and/or MRI defined disease activity.

Results: In total, 344 out of 542 (63.5%) patients reached EDSS ≥ 6.0; of these, 220 (64.0%) showed disease activity. In patients with activity, the number of relapses before reaching EDSS 3.0-4.0 predicted increasing disability; age > 45 at baseline predicted increasing disability without activity. Combining age and number of relapses increased the risk of and shortened the time to EDSS = 6.0.

Conclusion: Increasing disability is frequently associated with persistent activity. The high number of relapses identifies early those patients worsening in the presence of activity. Age predicts increasing disability in the absence of activity. The presence of both factors increases the risk of developing severe disability. As this study likely describes the transition to progression, our findings contribute to improving patient management and stratification in trials on progressive MS.

Keywords: MRI; Multiple sclerosis; age; disability; predictors; relapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: L.P. has received consulting and lecture fees and travel grant from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis and Teva. C.P. has received consulting, lecture fees and research funding and travel grant from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva. The other authors declare that they have nothing to disclose with respect to the subject matter of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
MS patients reaching the outcome (EDSS ≥ 6.0) or ending the follow-up before attaining it. Disease activity was defined as the occurrence of relapses or enhancing lesions on the MRI scan. Over a mean ± SD observation period of 6.3 ± 3.1 years, the majority of patients attained an EDSS ≥ 6.0, mainly in association with disease activity. The four groups defined by the attainment of the disability outcome in the presence or absence of disease activity are indicated as groups A, B, C and D.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier curves for profiles of increasing disability in MS patients. A composite risk score is shown of increasing disability that includes age at the time of EDSS 3.0–4.0 and number of relapses before attaining EDSS 3.0–4.0 as significant predictors of clinical evolution. Risk indicates the proportion of patients who reached the disability outcome in each scoring group. Hazard ratio (HR) indicates the risk of reaching the disability outcome with respect to the reference group of patients with age ≤ 45 years and ≤6 relapses. An increase in the risk score leads to a significantly increased probability of reaching the disability outcome.

References

    1. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions. Neurology 2014; 83: 278–286. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR, et al. Disability and T2 MRI lesions: A 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2008; 131: 808–817. - PubMed
    1. Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Degenhardt A, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis, a geographically based study 10: Relapses and long-term disability. Brain 2010; 133: 1914–1929. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tomassini V, Paolillo A, Russo P, et al. Predictors of long-term clinical response to interferon beta therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2006; 253: 287–293. - PubMed
    1. Signori A, Schiavetti I, Gallo F, et al. Subgroups of multiple sclerosis patients with larger treatment benefits: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Neurol 2015; 22: 960–966. - PubMed