Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Sep 1;3(9):823-828.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2258.

Efficacy and Safety of Further Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients Starting With Very Low Levels: A Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Further Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients Starting With Very Low Levels: A Meta-analysis

Marc S Sabatine et al. JAMA Cardiol. .

Abstract

Importance: In the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration (CTTC), in patients starting with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of approximately 3.4 mmol/L (131.5 mg/dL), there was a 22% reduction in major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) lowering of LDL-C. The magnitude of clinical benefit of further LDL-C lowering in patients already with very low LDL-C levels remains debated.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of further lowering LDL-C levels in patient populations presenting with median LDL-C levels of 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or less.

Data sources and study selection: The CTTC was used for statin data. For nonstatin therapy, Medline database was searched (2015-April 2018). Key inclusion criteria were a randomized, double-blind, controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of LDL-C lowering with data in populations starting with LDL-C levels averaging 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or less.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two authors independently extracted data into standardized data sheets, and data were analyzed using meta-analysis.

Main outcomes and measures: The risk ratio (RR) of major vascular events (a composite of coronary heart death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization) per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C level.

Results: In the subgroup of patients from the CTTC meta-analysis of statins with a mean LDL-C in the control arm of 1.7 mmol/L (65.7 mg/dL), 1922 major vascular events occurred and the RR for major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.94). For 3 trials of nonstatin LDL-C-lowering therapies added to statins, there were 50 627 patients, the median LDL-C in the control arms ranged from 1.6 mmol/L to 1.8 mmol/L (63 mg/dL to 70 mg/dL), and 9570 major vascular events occurred. Nonstatin therapy lowered LDL-C by 0.3 to 1.2 mmol/L (11 mg/dL to 45 mg/dL), and the RR for major vascular events per 1-mmol/L (38.7-mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.88). For statins and nonstatins combined, the RR was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87; P < .001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering was not associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events, myalgias and/or myositis, elevation in the level of aminotransferases, new-onset diabetes, hemorrhagic stroke, or cancer.

Conclusions and relevance: There is a consistent relative risk reduction in major vascular events per change in LDL-C in patient populations starting as low as a median of 1.6 mmol/L (63 mg/dL) and achieving levels as low as a median of 0.5 mmol/L (21 mg/dL), with no observed offsetting adverse effects. These data suggest further lowering of LDL-C beyond the lowest current targets would further reduce cardiovascular risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The TIMI Study Group has received grant support from Abbott Laboratories; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Critical Diagnostics; Daiichi-Sankyo; Eisai; Genzyme; Gilead; GlaxoSmithKline; Intarcia; Janssen Research and Development; Medicines Company; MedImmune; Merck; Novartis; Poxel; Pfizer; Roche Diagnostics; and Takeda. Dr Sabatine reports receiving honoraria for consulting from Alnylam; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; CVS Caremark; Dyrnamix; Esperion; Intarcia; Ionis; Janssen Research and Development; Medicines Company; MedImmune; Merck; MyoKardia; and Novartis. Dr Wiviott reports receiving consultant/advisory board fees from Angelmed, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Aegerion, Janssen, Merck, Arena, Xoma, Amgen, and ICON Clinical and Boston Clinical Research Institute. Dr Wiviott’s spouse is employed by Merck. Ms Murphy reports receiving consultant/advisory board fees from Amgen. Dr Giugliano reports receiving honoraria for continuing medical education activities from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, and Merck; and consulting/advisory board fees from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lexicon, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVS Caremark, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Lowering on the Risk of Major Vascular Events
A, Risk ratios (RRs) were generated from fixed-effects models. Size of data markers is weighted based on the inverse variance. I2 for heterogeneity 0%, P > .99. B, Levels of LDL-C in the control arm (square symbols) and experimental arm (arrowheads) in each of the nonstatin trials (trial arms connected by lines). The black line and dashed 95% CI are from a fixed-effects meta-regression. FOURIER indicates Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients With Elevated Risk; IMPROVE-IT, Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial; REVEAL, Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib through Lipid Modification. To convert LDL-C from millimoles per liter to milligrams per deciliter, multiply by 38.67.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Individual Efficacy Outcomes in Nonstatin Trials
In this analysis of the individual components of the composite outcome, ischemic stroke was used where available; otherwise all stroke was used. In Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT), per the trial end point definitions, coronary revascularizations were those that occurred at least 30 days after randomization. Patients could have had more than 1 event. The size of the boxes is proportional to the number of events. The horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. LDL-C indicates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Safety Outcomes in Nonstatin Trials
The size of the boxes is proportional to the weight in the analysis for each trial. The horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. FOURIER indicates Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients With Elevated Risk; IMPROVE-IT, Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial; REVEAL, Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib through Lipid Modification.

Comment in

References

    1. Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, et al. . Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2532-2561. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. ; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association . Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110(2):227-239. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al. ; Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration . Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670-1681. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group . Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-269, W64. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. ; IMPROVE-IT Investigators . Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387-2397. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1410489 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances