Adequacy of validation of wide-range cuffs used with home blood pressure monitors: a systematic review
- PMID: 30074520
- DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000344
Adequacy of validation of wide-range cuffs used with home blood pressure monitors: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: Wide-range 'one-size-fits-all' blood pressure (BP) cuffs are commonly sold with home BP monitors. Assessment of the accuracy of these cuffs is important because they do not adhere to the basic principles of proper cuffing. The aim of this systematic review was to review the published validation data evaluating the accuracy of wide-range cuffs.
Methods: Medline (1946-2017) and the Web of Science (2002-2017) were searched for home BP device validation studies carried out according to an established validation protocol and published in English. Studies that included assessment of a wide-range cuff (defined as a cuff with a range of 15 cm or greater) were sought. The quality of wide-range cuff assessment was scored on a three-point scale, with one point assigned each for (a) passing validation criteria, (b) full evaluation across the entire cuff range, and (c) reporting of results stratified by arm circumference.
Results: Twenty-five validation studies were identified, reporting data on 28 device/wide-range cuff combinations. Study quality was poor - 21 studies received a score of one and four studies received a score of two. All studies were awarded one point because the device-cuff combination passed the chosen validation protocol. Only two studies ensured full assessment of the cuff range; however, neither study reported results stratified by arm circumference. Of the two studies that did report results by arm circumference, one showed a potentially direct linear relationship between arm circumference and device-observer error.
Conclusion: Despite their widespread use, the evidence supporting use of wide-range home BP cuffs is inadequate.
Similar articles
-
Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Nov;22(11):796-800. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70. Epub 2008 Jul 3. J Hum Hypertens. 2008. PMID: 18596720
-
Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.Blood Press Monit. 2015 Feb;20(1):39-42. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000081. Blood Press Monit. 2015. PMID: 25144600
-
Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.Blood Press Monit. 2007 Jun;12(3):173-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280b08367. Blood Press Monit. 2007. PMID: 17496467
-
Validation of Blood Pressure Devices as per 2020 World Health Organization Technical Specifications: A Scoping Review of Global Literature.Hypertension. 2023 May;80(5):1110-1116. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20425. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Hypertension. 2023. PMID: 36912176
-
Improving the accuracy of blood pressure measurement: the influence of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices and future perspectives.J Hypertens. 2018 Mar;36(3):479-487. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001635. J Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29384984
Cited by
-
Overview of blood pressure measurement by Brazilian health professionals.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Oct;22(10):1941-1944. doi: 10.1111/jch.14010. Epub 2020 Aug 20. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020. PMID: 32815660 Free PMC article.
-
Automated blood pressure measuring devices: how are they clinically validated for accuracy?J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Feb;37(2):101-107. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00761-2. Epub 2022 Oct 11. J Hum Hypertens. 2023. PMID: 36220909 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources