Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 20:285:110-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Foodborne viruses: Detection, risk assessment, and control options in food processing

Affiliations
Review

Foodborne viruses: Detection, risk assessment, and control options in food processing

Albert Bosch et al. Int J Food Microbiol. .

Abstract

In a recent report by risk assessment experts on the identification of food safety priorities using the Delphi technique, foodborne viruses were recognized among the top rated food safety priorities and have become a greater concern to the food industry over the past few years. Food safety experts agreed that control measures for viruses throughout the food chain are required. However, much still needs to be understood with regard to the effectiveness of these controls and how to properly validate their performance, whether it is personal hygiene of food handlers or the effects of processing of at risk foods or the interpretation and action required on positive virus test result. This manuscript provides a description of foodborne viruses and their characteristics, their responses to stress and technologies developed for viral detection and control. In addition, the gaps in knowledge and understanding, and future perspectives on the application of viral detection and control strategies for the food industry, along with suggestions on how the food industry could implement effective control strategies for viruses in foods. The current state of the science on epidemiology, public health burden, risk assessment and management options for viruses in food processing environments will be highlighted in this review.

Keywords: Detection; Food; Processing technologies; Risk assessment; Virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abad F.X., Pintó R.M., Bosch A. Survival of enteric viruses on environmental fomites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:3704–3710. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abad F.X., Pintó R.M., Villena C., Gajardo R., Bosch A. Astrovirus survival in drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:3119–3122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboubakr H.A., El-Banna A.A., Youssef M.M., Al-Sohaimy S.A.A., Goyal S.M. Antiviral effects of Lactococcus lactis on feline calicivirus, a human norovirus surrogate. Food Environ. Virol. 2014;6:282–289. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF) Update on Viruses in the Food Chain [WWW Document] 2015. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/acmsf-virus-report.pdf URL.
    1. Afolayan O.T., Webb C.C., Cannon J.L. Evaluation of a porcine gastric mucin and RNase A assay for the discrimination of infectious and non-infectious GI. 1 and GII. 4 norovirus following thermal, ethanol, or levulinic acid plus sodium dodecyl sulfate treatments. Food Environ. Virol. 2016;8:70–78. - PubMed