Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;42(1):162-168.
doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9953-4. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

The role of group cohesion in a group-based behavioral weight loss intervention

Shannon S Taylor  1   2 , Maren K Olsen  3   4 , Megan A McVay  5 , Janet Grubber  3 , Jennifer M Gierisch  3   6 , William S Yancy Jr  3   7 , Corrine I Voils  8   9
Affiliations

The role of group cohesion in a group-based behavioral weight loss intervention

Shannon S Taylor et al. J Behav Med. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Behavioral weight loss interventions are often delivered in groups. Group cohesion may enhance program attendance and, thereby, weight loss. In this secondary analysis, our goals were to: (1a) assess whether group cohesion measured early in a behavioral weight loss intervention predicts program attendance and weight loss outcomes and, if so, (1b) explore whether attendance mediates the link between group cohesion and weight loss; (2) characterize the association between change in group cohesion and weight loss throughout the intervention. Veterans (n = 324) initiated a 16-week, group-based behavioral weight loss program involving biweekly in-person group visits. In linear regression models, early group cohesion was unrelated to group attendance or weight loss. Although group cohesion significantly increased during the intervention, this change was not associated with weight loss. These findings are consistent with the limited literature; however, they are inconsistent with theoretical assertions and clinical observations of the influence of group factors on outcomes.

Keywords: Group cohesion; Obesity; Social support; Weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Befort CA, Donnelly JE, Sullivan DK, Ellerbeck EF, & Perri MG (2010). Group versus individual phone-based obesity treatment for rural women. Eating Behaviors, 11(1), 11–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke SM, Carron AV, & Shapcott KM (2008). Cohesion in exercise groups: an overview. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 107–123.
    1. Burlingame GM, McClendon DT, & Alonso J (2011). Cohesion in group therapy. In Norcross JC (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (pp. 1–45): University Press Scholarship Online.
    1. Carron AV, & Brawley LR (2012). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 43(6), 726–743.
    1. Carron AV, Brawley LR, & Widmeyer WN (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In Duda JL (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Publication types