Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research
- PMID: 30080467
- PMCID: PMC6143362
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0159
Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research
Abstract
Medical biobanks often struggle to obtain sustainable funding. Commercialization of specimens is one solution, but disclosure of commercial interests to potential contributors can be dissuasive. Recent revisions to the federal human subjects research regulations will soon mandate such commercialization disclosure in some circumstances, which raises questions about implications for practice. In this nationally representative, probability-based survey sample of the US adult population, we found that 67 percent of participants agreed that clear notification of potential commercialization of biospecimens is warranted, but only 23 percent were comfortable with such use. Sixty-two percent believed that profits should be used only to support future research, and 41 percent supported sharing profits with the public. We also considered other factors related to disclosure in our analysis and argue for a "disclosure plus" standard: informing potential contributors that their biospecimens might be accessed by commercial organizations and explaining how profits would be used to both enhance transparency and facilitate contributors' altruistic motivations.
Keywords: Business Of Health; Ethical Issues; Legal/Regulatory Issues; Public Opinion; Research And Technology.
References
-
- Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Siewert M, Malviya S. Factors that influence parents’ decisions to consent to their child’s participation in clinical anesthesia research. Anesth Analg 1998;86(1):50–53. - PubMed
-
- Madsen SM, Holm S, Davidsen B, Munkholm P, Schlichting P, Riis P. Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non-cancer trials. J Intern Med 2000;248(6):463–74. - PubMed
-
- Moore v. Regents of University of California. 51 Cal. 3d 120 (1990).
-
- Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Social Security Administration, et al. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule. Fed Regist 2017;82(12):7149–274. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
