Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep:213:146-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.043. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care

Dimitra Petrakaki  1 , Eva Hilberg  2 , Justin Waring  3
Affiliations

Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care

Dimitra Petrakaki et al. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Recent health policy renders patients increasingly responsible for managing their health via digital technology such as health apps and online patient platforms. This paper discusses underlying tensions between empowerment and self-discipline embodied in discourses of technological self-care. It presents findings from documentary analysis and interviews with key players in the English digital health context including policy makers, health designers and patient organisations. We show how discourses ascribe to patients an enterprising identity, which is inculcated with economic interests and engenders self-discipline. However, this reading does not capture all implications of technological self-care. A governmentality lens also shows that technological self-care opens up the potential for a de-centring of medical knowledge and its subsequent communalization. The paper contributes to Foucauldian healthcare scholarship by showing how technology could engender agential actions that operate at the margins of an enterprising discourse.

Keywords: Empowerment; Governmentality; Self-discipline; Technology; UK.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams S., de Bont A. Information Rx: prescribing good consumerism and responsible citizenship. Health Care Anal. 2007;15(4):273–290. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams S.A. Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: the reflexive patient and “share-your-experience” websites. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011;72(7):1069–1076. - PubMed
    1. Alvesson M., Deetz S. Sage Publications; London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: 2000. Doing Critical Management Research.
    1. Alvesson M., Skoldberg K. Sage Publications Ltd; 2000. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research.
    1. Armstrong D. Actors, patients and agency: a recent history. Sociol. Health Illness. 2014;36(2):163–174. - PubMed

Publication types