Comparison of Longitudinal CA125 Algorithms as a First-Line Screen for Ovarian Cancer in the General Population
- PMID: 30084833
- PMCID: PMC6171745
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0208
Comparison of Longitudinal CA125 Algorithms as a First-Line Screen for Ovarian Cancer in the General Population
Abstract
Purpose: In the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), women in the multimodal (MMS) arm had a serum CA125 test (first-line), with those at increased risk, having repeat CA125/ultrasound (second-line test). CA125 was interpreted using the "Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm" (ROCA). We report on performance of other serial algorithms and a single CA125 threshold as a first-line screen in the UKCTOCS dataset.Experimental Design: 50,083 post-menopausal women who attended 346,806 MMS screens were randomly split into training and validation sets, following stratification into cases (ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancers) and controls. The two longitudinal algorithms, a new serial algorithm, method of mean trends (MMT) and the parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) were trained in the training set and tested in the blinded validation set and the performance characteristics, including that of a single CA125 threshold, were compared.Results: The area under receiver operator curve (AUC) was significantly higher (P = 0.01) for MMT (0.921) compared with CA125 single threshold (0.884). At a specificity of 89.5%, sensitivities for MMT [86.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 78.4-91.9] and PEB (88.5%; 95% CI, 80.6-93.4) were similar to that reported for ROCA (sensitivity 87.1%; specificity 87.6%; AUC 0.915) and significantly higher than the single CA125 threshold (73.1%; 95% CI, 63.6-80.8).Conclusions: These findings from the largest available serial CA125 dataset in the general population provide definitive evidence that longitudinal algorithms are significantly superior to simple cutoff values for ovarian cancer screening. Use of these newer algorithms requires incorporation into a multimodal strategy. The results highlight the importance of incorporating serial change in biomarker levels in cancer screening/early detection strategies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(19); 4726-33. ©2018 AACR.
©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
UM has stock ownership and has received research funding from Abcodia. She has received grants from the Medical Research Council (MRC), Cancer Research UK, (CR UK) the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), and The Eve Appeal. IJJ reports personal fees from and stock ownership in Abcodia as the non-executive director and consultant. He reports personal fees from Women’s Health Specialists as the director. He has a patent for the Risk of Ovarian Cancer algorithm and an institutional license to Abcodia with royalty agreement. He is a trustee (2012–14) and Emeritus Trustee (2015 to present) for The Eve Appeal. He has received grants from the MRC, CR UK, NIHR and The Eve Appeal. SJS reports personal fees from the LUNGevity Foundation and SISCAPA Assay Technologies as a member of their Scientific Advisory Boards. He reports personal fees from Abcodia as a consultant and AstraZeneca as a speaker honorarium. He has a patent for the Risk of Ovarian Cancer algorithm and an institutional license to Abcodia. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- CRUK. Cancer statistics: Ovarian cancer survival statistics. 2016 http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/survival/ Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st....
-
- American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about ovarian cancer? [cited 2016 07/07/2016];2016 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/ovariancancer/detailedguide/ovarian-cancer-....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
