Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct;53(4):1395-1434.
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4516. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review)

Affiliations
Review

Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review)

Alessia Finotti et al. Int J Oncol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

In oncology, liquid biopsy is used in the detection of next-generation analytes, such as tumor cells, cell-free nucleic acids and exosomes in peripheral blood and other body fluids from cancer patients. It is considered one of the most advanced non-invasive diagnostic systems to enable clinically relevant actions and implement precision medicine. Medical actions include, but are not limited to, early diagnosis, staging, prognosis, anticipation (lead time) and the prediction of therapy responses, as well as follow-up. Historically, the applications of liquid biopsy in cancer have focused on circulating tumor cells (CTCs). More recently, this analysis has been extended to circulating free DNA (cfDNA) and microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) associated with cancer, with potential applications for development into multi-marker diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic signatures. Liquid biopsies avoid some key limitations of conventional tumor tissue biopsies, including invasive tumor sampling, under-representation of tumor heterogeneity and poor description of clonal evolution during metastatic dissemination, strongly reducing the need for multiple sampling. On the other hand, this approach suffers from important drawbacks, i.e., the fragmentation of cfDNA, the instability of RNA, the low concentrations of certain analytes in body fluids and the confounding presence of normal, as well as aberrant DNAs and RNAs. For these reasons, the analysis of cfDNA has been mostly focused on mutations arising in, and pathognomonicity of, tumor DNA, while the analysis of cfRNA has been mostly focused on miRNA patterns strongly associated with neoplastic transformation/progression. This review lists some major applicative areas, briefly addresses how technology is bypassing liquid biopsy limitations, and places a particular emphasis on novel, PCR-free platforms. The ongoing collaborative efforts of major international consortia are reviewed. In addition to basic and applied research, we will consider technological transfer, including patents, patent applications and available information on clinical trials aimed at verifying the potential of liquid biopsy in cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Applications of liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer (CRC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study workflow on an in vivo model system to validate liquid biopsy protocols. Three human colorectal cancer cell lines can be selected as proxies of clinical cancers and cultured in vitro (top left panel) or used to establish tumor xenografts (top right panel). DNA and RNA can be isolated from cells, supernatants and tumor xenografts. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and microRNAs (miRNAs) can be isolated from blood plasma and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), reverse transcription (RT)-ddPCR and RT-quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be performed to detect KRAS mutations and miRNA analysis. Examples of published studies are reported within the boxes. Blue and orange arrows indicate positive events associated with miR-221 and mutG13D content.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of liquid and standard conventional tissue biopsies in colorectal cancer (CRC). Tissue biopsy samples single disease sites whereas liquid biopsy potentially samples all tumor sites, including circulating tumor cells.

References

    1. Heitzer E, Auer M, Ulz P, Geigl JB, Speicher MR. Circulating tumor cells and DNA as liquid biopsies. Genome Med. 2013;5:73. doi: 10.1186/gm477. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N, Bartlett BR, Wang H, Luber B, Alani RM, et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:224ra24. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domínguez-Vigil IG, Moreno-Martínez AK, Wang JY, Roehrl MHA, Barrera-Saldaña HA. The dawn of the liquid biopsy in the fight against cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;9:2912–2922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breitbach S, Tug S, Helmig S, Zahn D, Kubiak T, Michal M, Gori T, Ehlert T, Beiter T, Simon P. Direct quantification of cell-free, circulating DNA from unpurified plasma. PloS One. 2014;9:e87838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087838. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heitzer E, Ulz P, Geigl JB. Circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy for cancer. Clin Chem. 2015;61:112–123. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.222679. - DOI - PubMed