Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 7;8(1):11819.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30278-z.

Highly Stable Persistent Photoconductivity with Suspended Graphene Nanoribbons

Affiliations

Highly Stable Persistent Photoconductivity with Suspended Graphene Nanoribbons

Hiroo Suzuki et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Graphene nanoribbon (GNR), also known as 1-dimensional graphene, with a non-zero band gap has a huge potential for various electrical and optoelectrical applications because of its high transparency, flexibility, controllable band gap, and unique edge states. Recent advances in the synthesis of GNR enable us to show the possibility of GNRs as future high performance electrical devices. However, the applicability of GNRs to optoelectrical devices is unclear. Here we report that suspended GNR devices can show persistent photoconductivity (PPC) with long decay time (over 72 h) and adequate environmental stability. Repeated non-volatile memory operation is also demonstrated with an integrated PPC device using GNRs. This very stable PPC device can be applied to a wide variety of fields such as ultra-low-power non-volatile memory, nanoscale imaging, and biological sensors. Our results have opened the door to advance the study of GNRs in novel directions such as optoelectrical applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Schematic illustration of GNRs FET. (b) Typical IDS − VG curve of a GNRs-array FET under VDS = 1 V. SEM images of GNRs-array FET under (c) low and (d) high magnification. (e) Definition for Idark, Ion, Ioff, Iper, and Itemp. Top and bottom show example of the case of positive and negative ΔIDS, respectively. (f) Typical photoresponse properties of fresh (black) and old (purple) GNR samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(ac) Photoresponse of ΔIDS with different total mild O2 plasma treatment times (ttotal) (ttotal = (a) 0, (b) 60, (c) 570 sec). (d) Plot of Iper as a function of ttotal. (e) Continuously measured time profile of IDS for an old GNR sample up to ~4000 sec. The inset shows a plot of ΔIDS measured for a total of 3 days. All of the data in this figure were taken under VDS = 1 V, VG = −60 V.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a,b) (a) Optical microscope image and (b) Schematic illustration of PPC measurement in water. (c) Typical time profile of IDS for a GNR measured in water.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Typical time sequence of wiring and erasing operation. Definition of dark current after erasing (Idark) and erasing current (Ieras) are shown as arrows. (b) Writing and erasing operation process with different values of the erasing bias voltage (Veras). (c) The dependence of the recovery rate (Re) on Veras. (d) Repeated operation (8 cycles) of optical memory, timing of photo illumination (green) and application of Veras (orange) is shown in the upper graph. (e) Low and high magnification optical microscope images and SEM image of the integrated GNR memory (9 cells). Each cell includes 440 GNRs. (f) Plot of the resistance change before and after photo-irradiation for pristine (green) and mild O2-plasma-treated 9-cell GNR devices (yellow). (g,h) (g) Schematic illustration and (h) typical SEM image of a single-GNR device. (i) Comparison of device specifications between our GNR device and other memory devices. The arrow denotes the future possibilities of our GNR device.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a,b) Time resolved photoresponse of ΔIDS under (a) VG = −60 V, (b) VG = 0 V under VDS = 1 V. (c) VG dependency of temporary photocurrent (Itemp), persistent photocurrent (Iper), and Idark under VDS = 1 V. (d,e) Light power (P) dependence of (d) charge neutral point (VCNP) and (e) transconductance of electrons (gme) (blue triangle) and holes (gmh) (red square) normalized by the dark value under VDS = 1 V. (f) Schematic illustration of VG − IDS curve under dark (green) and (yellow) photo-irradiation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(ac) Schematic illustration and (df) charge-trapping mechanism of GNRs-Ni(OH)2 system for (a,d) before, (b,e) during photo-irradiation and (c,f) after the application of Veras.

References

    1. Son Y, Cohen ML, Louie SG. Energy Gaps in Graphene Nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:216803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li X, Wang X, Zhang L, Lee S, Dai H. Chemically Derived Ultrasmooth Graphene Nanoribbon Semiconductors. Science. 2008;319:1229–1232. doi: 10.1126/science.1150878. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nair RR, et al. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene. Science. 2008;320:1308. doi: 10.1126/science.1156965. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J. Measurement of the Elastic of Monolayer Graphene. Science. 2008;321:385–388. doi: 10.1126/science.1157996. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Han M, Özyilmaz B, Zhang Y, Kim P. Energy Band-Gap Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:206805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206805. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources