Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Oct;38(10):1365-1369.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0193-9. Epub 2018 Aug 7.

Sucrose vs. skin to skin care for preterm neonatal pain control-a randomized control trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Sucrose vs. skin to skin care for preterm neonatal pain control-a randomized control trial

Vivek Shukla et al. J Perinatol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of SSC with oral Sucrose for pain management in preterm neonates.

Methodology: Parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized control trial conducted from February-June 2017 at a level 3B-NICU. Hundred preterm neonates (29-0/7 to 36-6/7 weeks gestational age) requiring heel-stick were randomly assigned (1:1), to SSC (50, Group-A) and Sucrose (50, Group-B). In Group-A, SSC was provided at least 10 min before the procedure. In Group-B, 0.2 ml of oral Sucrose was provided 2 min before the procedure. Blinded assessment of Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score was done 30 s post-procedure using recorded videos.

Results: Baseline variables were [Mean(SD)] gestational age [32.79(2.34) weeks], age [14.04(11.10) days] and birth weight [1.62(0.35) kilograms]. PIPP score was less in group- A vs. B but could not achieve statistical significance [Mean(SD): 7.74(2.43) vs. 8.1(2.82), p = 0.50 CI of the difference: (-1.40,0.68)].

Conclusions: SSC and Sucrose have comparable efficacy in managing pain in premature neonates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources