Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

William A Grobman et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: The perinatal and maternal consequences of induction of labor at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women are uncertain.

Methods: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned low-risk nulliparous women who were at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation to labor induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications; the principal secondary outcome was cesarean delivery.

Results: A total of 3062 women were assigned to labor induction, and 3044 were assigned to expectant management. The primary outcome occurred in 4.3% of neonates in the induction group and in 5.4% in the expectant-management group (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.00). The frequency of cesarean delivery was significantly lower in the induction group than in the expectant-management group (18.6% vs. 22.2%; relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93).

Conclusions: Induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women did not result in a significantly lower frequency of a composite adverse perinatal outcome, but it did result in a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ARRIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01990612 .).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Silver reports receiving consulting fees from Gestavision. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Eligibility, Randomization, Delivery, and Assessment.
Per-protocol delivery in the induction group was defined as electively induced labor from 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or spontaneous labor or medically indicated delivery on or before 39 weeks 4 days (this also included delivery delayed past 39 weeks 4 days because of a new medical indication that had developed). Per-protocol delivery in the expectant-management group was defined as induction from 40 weeks 5 days to 42 weeks 2 days or spontaneous or medically indicated delivery on or before 42 weeks 2 days.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Prespecified Subgroup Analyses According to Maternal Baseline Variables.
The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications and consisted of one or more of the following during the antepartum or intrapartum period or during the delivery hospitalization: perinatal death, the need for respiratory support within the first 72 hours after birth, Apgar score of 3 or less at 5 minutes, hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection (confirmed sepsis or pneumonia), meconium aspiration syndrome, birth trauma (bone fracture, neurologic injury, or retinal hemorrhage), intracranial or subgaleal hemorrhage, or hypotension requiring vasopressor support. Race was reported by the participant; “other” race or ethnic group includes other, unknown, or more than one race or ethnic group. Modified Bishop scores range from 0 to 12, with lower scores associated with a higher chance of cesarean delivery. The body-mass index (BMI) is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.

References

    1. Parikh LI, Reddy UM, Männistö T, et al. Neonatal outcomes in early term birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(3): 265.e1–265.e11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 146: management of late-term and postterm pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 390–6. - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins — Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 386–97. - PubMed
    1. Vardo JH, Thornburg LL, Glantz JC. Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor. J Reprod Med 2011; 56: 25–30. - PubMed
    1. Dunne C, Da Silva O, Schmidt G, Natale R Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks’ gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 1124–30. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data