Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):535-546.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800927.

Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy and Lactation and Infant Growth

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy and Lactation and Infant Growth

Daniel E Roth et al. N Engl J Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation improves fetal and infant growth in regions where vitamin D deficiency is common.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Bangladesh to assess the effects of weekly prenatal vitamin D supplementation (from 17 to 24 weeks of gestation until birth) and postpartum vitamin D supplementation on the primary outcome of infants' length-for-age z scores at 1 year according to World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards. One group received neither prenatal nor postpartum vitamin D (placebo group). Three groups received prenatal supplementation only, in doses of 4200 IU (prenatal 4200 group), 16,800 IU (prenatal 16,800 group), and 28,000 IU (prenatal 28,000 group). The fifth group received prenatal supplementation as well as 26 weeks of postpartum supplementation in the amount of 28,000 IU (prenatal and postpartum 28,000 group).

Results: Among 1164 infants assessed at 1 year of age (89.5% of 1300 pregnancies), there were no significant differences across groups in the mean (±SD) length-for-age z scores. Scores were as follows: placebo, -0.93±1.05; prenatal 4200, -1.11±1.12; prenatal 16,800, -0.97±0.97; prenatal 28,000, -1.06±1.07; and prenatal and postpartum 28,000, -0.94±1.00 (P=0.23 for a global test of differences across groups). Other anthropometric measures, birth outcomes, and morbidity did not differ significantly across groups. Vitamin D supplementation had expected effects on maternal and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium concentrations, maternal urinary calcium excretion, and maternal parathyroid hormone concentrations. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of adverse events across groups, with the exception of a higher rate of possible hypercalciuria among the women receiving the highest dose.

Conclusions: In a population with widespread prenatal vitamin D deficiency and fetal and infant growth restriction, maternal vitamin D supplementation from midpregnancy until birth or until 6 months post partum did not improve fetal or infant growth. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924013 .).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1: Trial flow diagram
Figure 1: Trial flow diagram
Figure 2: Study design and CONSORT diagram
Figure 2: Study design and CONSORT diagram
Maternal, venous cord, and infant 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) [nmol/L], and maternal iPTH [pmol/L] concentrations, by vitamin D supplementation group. (A) Mean maternal 25(OH)D at baseline (n=1285), delivery (n=656; delivery specimens were collected within -19 days to 11 days of delivery [median: 0 days]), 3 months postpartum (n=581), and 6 months postpartum (n=590). Bars denote 95% confidence intervals (CI); (B) Mean 25(OH)D concentrations in venous cord (n=507), infants at 3 months (n=345), infants at 6 months (n=254), and infants at 12 months (n=182). Bars denote 95% CI; (C) Geometric means of maternal iPTH concentrations [pmol/L] at baseline (n=608), delivery (n=551; delivery specimens were collected within -19 days to 11 days of delivery [median: 0 days]), and 6 months postpartum (n=588). Bars denote 95% CI.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Danaei G, Andrews KG, Sudfeld CR, Fink G, McCoy DC, Peet E, et al. Risk Factors for Childhood Stunting in 137 Developing Countries: A Comparative Risk Assessment Analysis at Global, Regional, and Country Levels. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woo Baidal JA, Locks LM, Cheng ER, Blake-Lamb TL, Perkins ME, Taveras EM. Risk Factors for Childhood Obesity in the First 1,000 Days: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med 2016; 50: 761-79. - PubMed
    1. Devakumar D, Fall CH, Sachdev HS, Margetts BM, Osmond C, Wells JC, et al. Maternal antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation for long-term health benefits in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC medicine 2016; 14: 90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee AC, Kozuki N, Cousens S, Stevens GA, Blencowe H, Silveira MF, et al. Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21st standard: analysis of CHERG datasets. BMJ 2017; 358: j3677. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; 382: 427-51. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data