Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Dec;26(2):194-200.
doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_59_16.

Structure, process, and impact of a staff support group in an oncology setting in a developing country

Affiliations

Structure, process, and impact of a staff support group in an oncology setting in a developing country

Jayita Kedar Deodhar et al. Ind Psychiatry J. 2017 Jul-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Health-care staff working in oncology setting experience excessive stress, which if unrelieved can lead to burnout. Staff support groups have been found beneficial.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the structure, process, and impact of a staff support group conducted for field workers involved in cancer screening in an urban tertiary cancer center in a developing country.

Settings and design: Retrospective analysis of staff support group conducted in a tertiary care cancer center.

Methodology: Prospectively maintained data with structured notes for documenting the process of the support group sessions for the field workers was analyzed. Impact was analyzed through a feedback questionnaire designed for the purpose completed by participants at 4 months, 1, and 2 years following session completion.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics for reporting the overall structure and participants' profile and content analysis for identifying the support group process and themes expressed by the participants were used.

Results: Eleven participants attended the support group consisting of 8 structured sessions. The processes identified were planning, implementation, and supervision of the lead therapist conducting the group. Work overload, target completion, feeling demoralized, interpersonal conflicts, and importance of team support were the main issues identified. Cognitive behavioral approaches were learnt for stress management. Eight, nine, and all 11 participants found the support group moderately to very useful at 4 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively.

Conclusions: The support group followed a planned structure, with good implementation, recording of content and supervision, with both short-term and sustained positive impact.

Keywords: Developing country; oncology; screening; staff support group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Box 1
Box 1
Recommendations for staff support groups in oncology

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase. No. 11 [Internet] Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. [Last accessed on 2017 Aug 27]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.france .
    1. Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1133–45. - PubMed
    1. Giese-Davis J, Waller A, Carlson LE, Groff SL, Zhong L, Neri E, et al. Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: Common problems in cancer outpatients over one year in usual care: Associations with marital status, sex, and age. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gil Moncayo FL, Costa Requena G, Pérez FJ, Salamero M, Sánchez N, Sirgo A. Psychological adjustment and prevalence of psychiatric disorders in cancer patients. Med Clin (Barc) 2008;130:90–2. - PubMed
    1. Jones MC, Wells M, Gao C, Cassidy B, Davie J. Work stress and well-being in oncology settings: A multidisciplinary study of health care professionals. Psychooncology. 2013;22:46–53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources