Clinical efficacy of ticagrelor in patients undergoing emergency intervention for acute myocardial infarction and its impact on platelet aggregation rate
- PMID: 30093954
- PMCID: PMC6079137
Clinical efficacy of ticagrelor in patients undergoing emergency intervention for acute myocardial infarction and its impact on platelet aggregation rate
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of ticagrelor in patients who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and its impact on platelet aggregation rate.
Methods: A total of 257 AMI patients who underwent emergency PCI in our hospital were included in the present study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: ticagrelor group (n = 129), patients took 180 mg of ticagrelor (qd) before the intervention, and subsequently took 90 mg of ticagrelor (bid) for maintenance; clopidogrel group (n = 128), patients took 300 mg of clopidogrel (qd) before PCI, and subsequently took 75 mg of clopidogrel (qd) for maintenance. Patients in both groups took 100 mg of aspirin. The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within one year, changes in LVEF and LVEDD, platelet aggregation rate and drug safety before PCI and at one week and 30 days after PCI were observed in these two groups.
Results: The differences in baseline data between these two groups were not statistically significant. Within one year after the intervention, in the ticagrelor group, the total incidence of MACE was lower (P < 0.05), LVEF and LVEDD was improved (P < 0.05), and the decrease in platelet aggregation rate after the intervention was more significant (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of bleeding events was higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor decreases the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in AMI patients who underwent emergency PCI, does better in improving the fluctuation level of LVEF and LVEDD, and strongly inhibits platelet aggregation. Some patients encountered adverse drug events, but drug withdrawal or medication change did not occur.
Keywords: Ticagrelor; acute myocardial infarction; emergency intervention; platelet aggregation rate.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
References
-
- National Health and Family Planning Commission. China’s annual statistical yearbook for health and family planning 2016. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College press; 2016.
-
- Chen FY. Treatment of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention in China. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016;25:857–861.
-
- Samoš M, Šimonová R, Kovář F, Duraj L, Fedorová J, Galajda P, Staško J, Fedor M, Kubisz P, Mokáň M. Clopidogrel resistance in diabetic patient with acute myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:461–465. - PubMed
-
- Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, Price MJ, Jeong YH, Angiolillo DJ, Stone GW, Curzen N, Geisler T, TenBerg J, Kirtane A, Siller-Matula J, Mahla E, Becker RC, Bhatt DL, Waksman R, Rao SV, Alexopoulos D, Marcucci R, Reny J, Trenk D, Sibbing D, Gurbel PA Working Group on On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2261–2273. - PubMed
-
- Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, Tantry US, Gesheff T, Wei C, Teng R, Antonino MJ, Patil SB, Karunakaran A, Kereiakes DJ, Parris C, Purdy D, Wilson V, Ledley GS, Storey RF. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation. 2009;120:2577–2585. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous