Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 24:13:19-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.008. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Agronomic efficiency of NBPT as a urease inhibitor: A review

Affiliations
Review

Agronomic efficiency of NBPT as a urease inhibitor: A review

Heitor Cantarella et al. J Adv Res. .

Abstract

Urea is the most widely used nitrogen (N) fertilizer, with a projected increase in annual demand of 1.5% in the coming years. After its application to soil, urea undergoes hydrolysis via the urease enzyme, causing increases in the soil pH in the surrounding area of the granules and resulting in NH3 losses that average 16% of N applied worldwide and can reach 40% or more in hot and humid conditions. The use of urease inhibitors is an effective way to reduce NH3 losses. Several compounds act as urease inhibitors, but only N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) has been used worldwide, being the most successful in a market that has grown 16% per year in the past 10 years. Only in the past three years other compounds are being commercially launched. In comparison to urea, NBPT-treated urea reduces NH3 loss by around 53%. Yield gain by NBPT usage is of the order of 6.0% and varies from -0.8 to 10.2% depending on crop species. Nitrification inhibitors usually increase NH3 volatilization and mixing them with urease inhibitors partially offsets the benefits of the latter in reducing NH3 loss. The efficacy of NBPT to reduce NH3 loss is well documented, but there is a need for further improvement to increase the period of inhibition and the shelf life of NBPT-treated urea.

Keywords: Ammonia volatilization; NBPT; NPPT; Nitrogen fertilizer; Nutrient use efficiency; Soil urease; Urea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Daily (A) and cumulative (B) ammonia volatilization losses after urea application with urease (NBPT) and nitrification (DCD) inhibitors. Reprinted from Soares et al. , with permission from Elsevier.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative NH3 loss during 42 d after application of urea and urea treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT). The points of the curves correspond to the arithmetic average of daily cumulative NH3 loss compiled from 35 studies. The dash-dotted lines (urea) and dotted lines (urea + NBPT) represent (X axis) the number of days that elapsed for 20, 50, and 75% of the total NH3 losses to occur. The R2 value was 0.99 for both the urea and the urea + NBPT models. Reprinted from Silva et al. with permission from The American Society of Agronomy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Total NH3 loss of urea and urea + NBPT (left) and the average reduction in NH3 loss by treating urea with NBPT in comparison to untreated urea (right) considering the selected studies presented in Table 1-S of the Supplementary Material.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Average yield increase per crop by treating urea with NBPT in comparison to the untreated urea, considering the selected studies presented in Table 2-S of the Supplementary Material. Error bars (right) represent the maximum and minimum values found in the original studies.

References

    1. IFA International Fertilizer Association. Fertilizer outlook 2017–2021. IFA annual conference – 22–24 May 2017 Marrakech (Marocco). Paris: IFA International Fertilizer Association, Services PITaA; 2017 June 2017.
    1. IFA International Fertilizer Association. Short-term fertilizer outlook 2017–2018 report. Paris: IFA International Fertilizer Association, Services PITaA; 2017 November 2017.
    1. Bittman S., Dedina M., Howard C.M., Oenema O., Sutton M.A. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH); Edinburgh: 2014. Options for ammonia mitigation: guidance from the UNECE Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen.
    1. Sutton M.A., Bleeker A., Howard C.M., Bekunda M., Grizzetti B., de Vries W. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; Edinburgh: 2013. Our Nutrient World: the challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution.
    1. Sutton M.A., Erisman J.W., Dentener F., Möller D. Ammonia in the environment: from ancient times to the present. Environ Pollut. 2008;156:583–604. - PubMed