Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul;6(13):264.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.03.

Quality in endoscopy training-the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography case

Affiliations
Review

Quality in endoscopy training-the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography case

Ivan Jovanovic et al. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most advanced therapeutic procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy. It is highly operator-dependent procedure requiring specific, knowledge-based training in order to achieve competence. Strategies for assessing competency of trainees and those in practice include numbers of procedures performed, and subjective or objective assessment by a mentor or self-assessment by the trainee. However, it is still not clear how to measure the quality in (ERCP) training in an objective and reproducible way, so far. Thus, in this article, we will discuss issues related to training in ERCP and provide experience based discussion on how to best approach and master this complex and risky procedure.

Keywords: Endoscopy; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); quality; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-18. 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalaitzakis E. All-cause mortality after ERCP. Endoscopy 2016;48:987-94. 10.1055/s-0042-111319 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johanson JF, Schmitt CM, Deas TM, et al. Quality and outcomes assessment in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:827-30. 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70218-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K, et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde holangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:892-97. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00675.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adler DG, Lieb JG, 2nd, Cohen J, et al. ASGE/ACG Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:54-66. 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.056 - DOI - PubMed