Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2018 Aug;66(8):1451-1454.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15441. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

Frailty and Resilience as Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials and Geriatric Care: Are We Getting Any Closer?

George A Kuchel  1
Affiliations
Editorial

Frailty and Resilience as Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials and Geriatric Care: Are We Getting Any Closer?

George A Kuchel. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Kuchel is Deputy Editor of the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PubMed citations of the term “frailty” 1985–2017.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Golden Gate Bridge is presented as a visual metaphor for the complementary contributions made by different conceptual constructs to the integrity and function of a complex system. A. Phenotypic frailty involves the existence of a specific state or phenotype that is defined by measurable changes involving structures such as a major tower (red) or horizontal cable (red long dash) that perform unique functions and are critical to the existence of the overall system. B. Stochastic frailty is defined as a process whereby the accumulation of deficits involving more redundant structures such as vertical cables (absent or red stippled) raises system vulnerability. C. Resilience evaluates the ability of the system to withstand expected stressors such as bridge traffic, wind and water currents (red arrows). All of these complementary perspectives must be considered when designing a bridge or providing care for older adults. Each approach has its strengths as regards specific questions and further research is needed. However, phenotypic frailty is most helpful when focusing on a specific clinical state associated with increased vulnerability and for measuring the effects of an intervention targeting risk factors or mechanisms that are relatively specific to that condition. Stochastic frailty may be most helpful for individual prognostication and for evaluating interventions that are more pleiotropic or that target shared risk factors or biological mechanisms.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

References

    1. Buta BJ, Walston JD, Godino JG, et al. Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Research Reviews. 2016;26:53–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–762. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cesari M, Gambassi G, van Kan GA, Vellas B. The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes. Age Ageing. 2014;43:10–12. - PubMed
    1. Walston J, Robinson TN, Zieman S, et al. Integrating Frailty Research into the Medical Specialties-Report from a U13 Conference. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:2134–2139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown RT, Covinsky KE. Frailty as an Outcome in Geriatrics Research: Not Ready for Prime Time? Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:361–362. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources