Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;37(11):1474-1477.
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001711.

Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank

Affiliations

Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank

John Lohmeier et al. Cornea. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Preloaded, trifolded grafts in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty require transfer of the trifolding process from the corneal transplant surgeon to the eye bank technician. We sought to assess whether trifolding may be safely conducted by an eye bank technician with cell loss comparable to standard peeling and lifting.

Methods: A total of 10 grafts were stained, peeled, and transferred directly onto a bed of Calcein-AM and Amvisc Plus by an eye bank technician. Five grafts were removed and stained as a scroll, and 5 grafts were trifolded with the endothelium in before transfer. Photographs were acquired with an inverted fluorescence microscope, and image segmentation was performed. A t test was conducted to compare differences in endothelial cell loss across groups.

Results: Mean cell loss in the scroll group was 18.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.2%-21.9%] compared with 7.6% of the trifolded group (95% CI: 1.7%-13.5%). A 2-tailed t test indicated decreased cell loss in the trifolded group (P = 0.013).

Conclusions: Despite additional manipulation of the graft, trifolding of Descemet membrane and endothelium may be performed by an eye bank technician without significantly increased cell loss relative to graft preparation as a scroll.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The following authors have ownership interest in Treyetech, Inc.: (EC, KB, SC, CC, AS, AE)

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Tri-folding of the DMEK graft. (A) The first flap of tri-fold is lifted with forceps. (B) This flap, approximately one-third of the DMEK graft in width, is laid onto the central, posterior corneal surface. (C) The corneal bed is rotated 180 degrees to facilitate folding and the second flap of tri-fold is lifted with forceps. (D) The second flap completely overlaps the first flap, creating a tri-fold configuration.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Sample image from DMEK graft pulled up using unsupported forceps method by a certified, experienced eye bank technician. A “V sign” of endothelial damage extending from the point of fixation was commonly seen using this method. (B) Sample image from DMEK graft tri-folded by a certified, experienced eye bank technician. Linear streaks are consistent with iatrogenic folds applied to the graft. (C, D) Segmented image in Fiji demonstrates focal areas of cell loss.

References

    1. Feng MT, Price MO, Price FW., Jr Update on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53:31–45. - PubMed
    1. Dapena I, Ham L, Melles G. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK - the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:299–307. - PubMed
    1. Tran KD, Dye PK, Odell K, et al. Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Prestripped, Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts. Cornea. 2017;36:484–490. - PubMed
    1. Wolle M, DeMill DL, Johnson L, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts. Cornea. 2017;36:1295–1301. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palioura S, Colby K. Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Using Eye Bank-Prepared Preloaded Grafts. Cornea. 2017;36:21–25. - PubMed