Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 8;7(8):206.
doi: 10.3390/jcm7080206.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Clinical Trials for Insomnia

Affiliations

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Clinical Trials for Insomnia

Hendrikje Huls et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have eligibility criteria for the inclusion of participants. Ideally, the RCT sample would be representative for the patient population that will use the drug under investigation. However, external validity may be at stake when applying too many or too restrictive eligibility criteria. The current two-part study examined (1) the currently applied eligibility criteria in Phase II and III RCTs examining sleep medication; (2) how these criteria match with the insomnia population as a whole; and (3) how inclusion rates can be changed by an adaptation of these criteria. In the first study, insomnia RCTs were screened at www.clinicaltrials.gov, and relevant eligibility criteria were identified. The second study comprised a survey among self-reported insomnia patients. It was determined to what extent RCT eligibility criteria match the characteristics of this patient population. Of the n = 519 patients that completed the survey only n = 2 (0.4%) met all eligibility criteria of current RCTs. RCT enrolment criteria are not representative for the insomnia patient population as a whole. Being less rigorous in applying upper or lower criteria limits results in a significant increase in the number of eligible patients, and increases the representativeness of RCTs for the insomnia patient population as a whole. The current analysis demonstrates that is important to thoroughly reconsider the use eligibility criteria and their inclusion ranges, and to have a theoretical basis for using them.

Keywords: clinical trial; efficacy; eligibility; exclusion criteria; inclusion criteria; insomnia; patient selection; recruitment; safety; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Thomas Roth has received grants/research support from Aventis, Cephalon, Glaxo Smith Kline, Neurocrine, Pfizer, Sanofi, Schering-Plough, Sepracor, Somaxon, Syrex, Takeda, TransOral, Wyeth and Xenoport and has acted as a consultant for Abbott, Acadia, Acoglix, Actelion, Alchemers, Alza, Ancil, Arena, Astra Zeneca, Aventis, AVER, BMS, BTG, Cephalon, Cypress, Dove, Elan, Eli Lilly, Evotec, Forest, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hypnion, Impax, Intec, Intra-Cellular, Jazz, Johnson & Johnson, King, Lundbeck, McNeil, Medici Nova, Merck, Neurim, Neurocrine, Neurogen, Novartis, Orexo, Organon, Prestwick, Procter-Gamble, Pfizer, Purdue, Resteva, Roche, Sanofi, Schering-Plough, Sepracor, Servier, Shire, Somaxon, Syrex, Takeda, TransOral, Vanda, Vivometrics, Wyeth, Yamanuchi, and Xenoport. Joris Verster has received grants/research support from the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Janssen, Nutricia, Red Bull, Sequential, and Takeda, and has acted as a consultant for the Canadian Beverage Association, Centraal Bureau Drogisterijbedrijven, Clinilabs, Coleman Frost, Danone, Deenox, Eisai, Janssen, Jazz, Purdue, Red Bull, Sanofi-Aventis, Sen-Jam Pharmaceutical, Sepracor, Takeda, Transcept, Trimbos Institute, Vital Beverages, and ZBiotics. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart summarizing the selection of relevant Phase II and III clinical trials in insomnia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of eligible patients as an effect of changing an upper or lower criterion limit. BMI = body mass index.

References

    1. Gross C.P., Mallory R., Heiat A., Krumholz H.M. Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: Who are these patients and how did they get here? Ann. Intern. Med. 2002;137:10–16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-1-200207020-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rothwell P.M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005;365:82–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heffron T.M. Insomnia Awareness Day Facts and Stats. Tratto Da Sleep Education. [(accessed on 1 April 2018)]; Available online: http://www.sleepeducation.org/news/2014/03/10/insomnia-awareness-day-fac....
    1. Cao X.L., Wang S.B., Zhong B.L., Zhang L., Ungvari G.S., Ng C.H., Li L., Chiu H.F.K., Lok G.K.I., Lu J.P., et al. The prevalence of insomnia in the general population in China: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170772. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van de Straat V., Bracke P. How well does Europe sleep? A cross-national study of sleep problems in European older adults. Int. J. Public Health. 2015;60:643–650. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0682-y. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources