Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 9;11(8):1388.
doi: 10.3390/ma11081388.

Study of the Influence of Shielding Gases on Laser Metal Deposition of Inconel 718 Superalloy

Affiliations

Study of the Influence of Shielding Gases on Laser Metal Deposition of Inconel 718 Superalloy

Jose Exequiel Ruiz et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

The use of the Laser Metal Deposition (LMD) technology as a manufacturing and repairing technique in industrial sectors like the die and mold and aerospace is increasing within the last decades. Research carried out in the field of LMD process situates argon as the most usual inert gas, followed by nitrogen. Some leading companies have started to use helium and argon as carrier and shielding gas, respectively. There is therefore a pressing need to know how the use of different gases may affect the LMD process due there being a lack of knowledge with regard to gas mixtures. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the influence of a mixture of argon and helium on the LMD process by analyzing single tracks of deposited material. For this purpose, special attention is paid to the melt pool temperature, as well as to the characterization of the deposited clads. The increment of helium concentration in the gases of the LMD processes based on argon will have three effects. The first one is a slight reduction of the height of the clads. Second, an increase of the temperature of the melt pool. Last, smaller wet angles are obtained for higher helium concentrations.

Keywords: Inconel 718; LMD; additive manufacturing; argon; helium; laser metal deposition; melt pool temperature; shielding gas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental setup.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clad cross section parameters.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Temperature [K] vs. time [s].

References

    1. Gibson I., Rosen D., Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 2nd ed. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2015. Directed Energy Deposition Processes; pp. 245–268.
    1. Cortina M., Arrizubieta J.I., Ruiz J.E., Lamikiz A., Ukar E. Design and manufacturing of a protective nozzle for highly reactive materials processing via Laser Material Deposition. Procedia CIRP. 2018;68:387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.100. - DOI
    1. Li P., Yang T., Li S., Liu D., Hu Q., Xiong W., Zeng X. Direct laser fabrication of nickel alloy samples. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2015;45:1288–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.014. - DOI
    1. Kumar L.J., Nair C.K. Laser metal deposition repair applications for Inconel 718 alloy. Mater. Today Proc. 2017;4:11068–11077. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.08.068. - DOI
    1. Gasser A. Laser Metal Deposition. In: Poprawe P., editor. Tailored Light 2. 1st ed. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2011. pp. 15–40.