Assessing the impact of the public nutrition information environment: Adapting the cancer information overload scale to measure diet information overload
- PMID: 30097378
- PMCID: PMC6289837
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.020
Assessing the impact of the public nutrition information environment: Adapting the cancer information overload scale to measure diet information overload
Abstract
Objective: A growing body of research suggests that exposure to too much information - particularly contradictory information that characterizes much health-related information - can lead to feeling overwhelmed. This construct has been conflated with fatalistic beliefs that are negatively associated with preventive behaviors. The objective of this study was to adapt the 8-item Cancer Information Overload (CIO) scale to assess overload of healthy diet information.
Methods: Confirmatory factor analyses with a community sample of rural California adults (n = 290; 75% female; 58% Latino; 46% ≤ H.S./G.E.D.).
Results: Items assessing Diet Information Overload loaded significantly on their relevant factor; factor loadings were acceptable (β >.40). The adapted original scale (CFI = 1.000, RSMEA = .000, SMSR = .022) and a shorter 5-item scale (CFI = .984, RMSEA = .051, SMSR = .026) fit well.
Conclusion: The Cancer Information Overload scale was successfully adapted and shortened to measure perceptions - previously mischaracterized as fatalistic - pertaining to diet information. Improved measures distinguishing between fatalistic beliefs and outcomes of the information environment are critical.
Practice implications: Understanding information overload is important for shaping prevention messages distinct from those needed to address fatalistic beliefs. Nutrition education efforts should consider the broader - cluttered - information environment in which nutrition education and communication occurs, and public health messages may drown.
Keywords: Beliefs; CFA; DIO scale; Diet; Information overload; Measurement; Nutrition.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
References
-
- WHO Noncommunicable diseases, WHO. (2017). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/ (accessed September 26, 2017).
-
- Ramirez AS, Freres D, Martinez LS, Lewis N, Bourgoin A, Kelly BJ, Lee C-J, Nagler RH, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC, Information Seeking From Media and Family/Friends Increases the Likelihood of Engaging in Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors, J. Health Commun 18 (2013) 527–542. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.743632. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fernstrom MH, Reed KA, Rahavi EB, Dooher CC, Communication strategies to help reduce the prevalence of non-communicable diseases: proceedings from the inaugural IFIC Foundation Global Diet and Physical Activity Communications Summit., Nutr. Rev 70 (2012) 301–10. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00480.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hornick BA, Childs NM, Smith Edge M, Kapsak WR, Dooher C, White C, Is it Time to Rethink Nutrition Communications? A 5-Year Retrospective of Americans’ Attitudes toward Food, Nutrition, and Health, J. Acad. Nutr. Diet 113 (2013) 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC, Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour, The Lancet. 376 (2010) 1261–1271. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous