Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Apr;42(4):403-409.
doi: 10.1007/s40618-018-0929-6. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

Short-term efficacy of high intensity group and individual education in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized single-center trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short-term efficacy of high intensity group and individual education in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized single-center trial

R Reale et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this randomized study was to examine the efficacy of two high intensity educational programs: the conversation maps-based (CM™) education and the individual education (IE), compared to usual care (UC) in a cohort of type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients.

Methods: Ninety T2DM outpatients (30 per group) were randomized and 79 finished the study and were analyzed. The CM™ and IE groups received four educational sessions at 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, while the UC group received two brief individual sessions at 0 and 12 weeks. We evaluated glycemic control (HbA1c), diabetes treatment, body mass index (BMI) and carried out a questionnaire survey at three time points (before intervention, at 12 and at 32 weeks) to assess patients' satisfaction, attitudes toward diabetes and dietary knowledge.

Results: All the three groups showed a significant and comparable reduction of both HbA1c and BMI. Diabetes therapy needed to be reinforced in a higher percentage of cases (39.3%) among UC patients compared to the IE (14.8%; p = 0.04) and the CM™ (8.3%; p = 0.01) groups. At 32 weeks Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction (DTSQ Q1 + Q4-8) significantly improved in the CM™ group (25.8 ± 4.5 vs. 22.4 ± 6.0; p < 0.01) and attitudes toward diabetes (ATT19) significantly improved in the IE group (58.0 ± 4.7 vs. 55.3 ± 5.1; p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Our trial provides preliminary data regarding the efficacy of structured group and individual education on achieving better glyco-metabolic control without drug therapy reinforcement and with positive effects on patients' attitude and treatment satisfaction.

Keywords: Conversation map; Individual education; Treatment satisfaction; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD001481 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):561-87 - PubMed
    1. Diabetologia. 2002 Sep;45(9):1231-9 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1002-7 - PubMed
    1. J Assoc Physicians India. 2003 Apr;51:363-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources