Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986;23(1):31-40.
doi: 10.1007/BF02100996.

Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila

Comparative Study

Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila

M Solignac et al. J Mol Evol. 1986.

Abstract

Detailed restriction maps (40 cleavage sites on average) of mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNAs) from the eight species of the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila were established. Comparison of the cleavage sites allowed us to build a phylogenetic tree based on the matrix of nucleotide distances and to select the most parsimonious network. The two methods led to similar results, which were compared with those in the literature obtained from nuclear characters. The three chromosomally homosequential species D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia are mitochondrially very related, but exhibit complex phylogenetic relationships. D. melanogaster is their closest relative, and the four species form a monophyletic group (the D. melanogaster complex), which is confirmed by the shared unusual length of their mt genomes (18-19 kb). The other four species of the subgroup (D. yakuba, D. teissieri, D. erecta, and D. orena) are characterized by a much shorter mt genome (16-16.5 kb). The monophyletic character of the D. yakuba complex, however, is questionable. Two species of this complex, D. yakuba and D. teissieri, are mitochondrially indistinguishable (at the level of our investigation) in spite of their noticeable allozymic and chromosomal divergence. Finally, mtDNA distances were compared with the nuclear-DNA distances thus far established. These sequences seem to evolve at rather similar rates, the mtDNA rate being barely double that of nuclear DNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Mol Biol. 1981 Nov 25;153(1):1-21 - PubMed
    1. Evolution. 1979 Dec;33(4):1063-1068 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1982;18(4):225-39 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):681-721 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1984;21(1):1-13 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources