Calculated Estimates of Plasma Volume in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure-Comparison With Measured Volumes
- PMID: 30098381
- PMCID: PMC6196104
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.07.462
Calculated Estimates of Plasma Volume in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure-Comparison With Measured Volumes
Abstract
Background: Calculated estimates of plasma volume (PV) have been developed with the use of hemoglobin/hematocrit-body weight-based methods. The accuracy of such formula-derived values has not been thoroughly evaluated. The objective of this analysis was to compare the calculated estimate and a quantitative measure of PV in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
Methods and results: PV was measured with the use of a standardized computer-based indicator-dilution-labeled albumin technique in 110 patients with clinically stable chronic HF and correlated with paired Kaplan-Hakim (K-H) and Strauss formula estimates of PV. The K-H formula underestimated (3.4 ± 0.7 L) and the Strauss formula overestimated (5.3 ± 1.5 L) PV relative to the measured volume (4.3 ± 1.1 L). Calculated PV was only moderately correlated with measured PV by the K-H formula (r = 0.64; P < .001) and weakly by the Strauss formula (r = 0.285; P = .003). Strauss formula estimates of change (%) in PV were also poorly correlated with paired measured changes in PV (r = 0.162; P = .999; n = 40).
Conclusions: Calculated estimates of PV demonstrate limited association with measured volumes. These findings indicate that although formula-based estimates of PV have been shown to have prognostic value, they are limited in their reliability for volume management in patients with chronic HF.
Keywords: Formula estimated plasma volume; chronic heart failure; measured plasma volume.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Figures
Comment in
-
The unit of Estimated Plasma Volume in Patients with Heart Failure using the Strauss-derived Duarte formula is not liter but dL/g.J Card Fail. 2019 Feb;25(2):140. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13. J Card Fail. 2019. PMID: 30552968 No abstract available.
-
Response to Letter to the Editor by Dr Kobayashi and Colleagues.J Card Fail. 2019 Feb;25(2):141. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 7. J Card Fail. 2019. PMID: 30630063 No abstract available.
References
-
- Miller WL, Mullan BP. Understanding the heterogeneity in volume overload and fluid distribution in decompensated heart failure is key to optimal volume management: role for blood volume quantitation. JACC Heart Fail. 2014; 2:298–305. - PubMed
-
- Androne AS, Hryniewicz K, Hudaihed A, Mancini D, Lamanca J, Katz SD. Relation of unrecognized hypervolemia in chronic heart failure to clinical status, hemodynamics, and patient outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93:1254–9. - PubMed
-
- Strobeck JE, Miller WL. Impact of blood volume quantification on decongestion strategy, readmission rates (RR), and mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients (HHF). Moderated oral poster session. J Am Coll Cardiol. April 2, 2016, 67(13) Supplement, p 1276.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
