Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Management of Anemia: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Anemia is a frequently diagnosed condition that may be a symptom of or complication of many illnesses affecting patients of all demographics. Anemia can lead to both worsened clinical outcomes and reduced quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are methodological tools used to capture the impact of disease on patient well-being. Use of PROMs in medical research is becoming more common as it is increasingly recognized that disease outcomes of interest to researchers and clinicians are not always consistent with patients' greatest concerns related to their diseases. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the studies that have evaluated patient-centered outcomes using PROMs in patients undergoing treatment for anemia. We conducted a search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsychINFO, and CINAHL databases for studies published until January 2017 that investigated an intervention to treat anemia in any patient population and used at least 1 PROM to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. A descriptive synthesis was performed to characterize the PROMs used and to evaluate the quality of patient-centered outcome (PCO) reporting. Of the 3224 studies identified in the initial search, 130 met all eligibility criteria. We found that the population most frequently studied was oncology patients (46.2% of studies). The therapy for anemia evaluated in the most studies was erythropoietin-stimulating agents (77.7% of studies). The most commonly used PROM was the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy tool (46.9%), and the majority of studies used only 1 PROM tool (53.1%). We found significant variability in the quality of PCO reporting across all included studies. Improved methodologic rigor in the assessment of PCOs in anemia management is needed in future studies.

Keywords: Anemia; Patient-centered outcomes; Quality of life; Scoping review.