Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Aug;14(2):250-254.
doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.5609.

Natural History of Tympanic Membrane Retraction in Children with Cleft Palate

Affiliations
Observational Study

Natural History of Tympanic Membrane Retraction in Children with Cleft Palate

William Parkes et al. J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The natural history of tympanic membrane retraction is unpredictable. To obtain prognostic information for guiding surveillance and treatment, a cohort of children with retraction from cleft palate were prospectively followed for over 5 years.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study at a tertiary academic institution. Children with pars tensa retraction were selected from a cohort of 143 children with cleft palate. Thirty-seven ears were assessed with otoendoscopic image capture and audiometry at a median age of 9 years and reassessed at a median follow-up interval of 6.4 years. The severity of tympanic membrane retraction in the serial images of each ear was compared by four pediatric otolaryngologists blinded to the dates of the images.

Results: Initially, 19/37 retractions (51%) demonstrated contact with the incus and/or promontory. Follow-up images were rated as stable (n=16) or better (n=12) for 28/37 retractions (76%). Of the nine retractions that became more extensive, two developed cholesteatoma (5% of the total). No ossicular erosion developed in ears without cholesteatoma. Conductive hearing loss (4-tone average air-bone gap >25 decibels hearing level) was initially present in five ears, worsened in one, and normalized without intervention in others. No ears with initial normal hearing developed hearing loss.

Conclusion: Most tympanic membrane retractions remained stable or improved over time in this cohort of children who were at a risk of persistent eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinically significant progression occurred infrequently, justifying the conservative approach taken to manage these retractions. Such data are necessary to weigh the potential benefit of preventive intervention over observation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1. a, b
Figure 1. a, b
Serial otoendoscopic images taken of the right tympanic membrane in a child with cleft palate. (a) Pars tensa retraction contacting the promontory, long process of the incus, stapes capitulum, and stapedius tendon. (b) Spontaneous lateralization of the retraction noted 7 years later with no further evidence of any ossicular contact
Figure 2. a, b
Figure 2. a, b
Otoendoscopic images taken of the right tympanic membrane from the same ear on the same day. (a) Diffuse retraction of the pars tensa with obvious ossicular contact but no definitive erosion of the incus. (b) Change in angulation of the scope clearly demonstrates distal erosion of the incus long process

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maw AR, Hall AJ, Pothier DD, Gregory SP, Steer CD. The prevalence of tympanic membrane and related middle ear pathology in children: a large longitudinal cohort study followed from birth to age ten. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:1256–61. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822f10cf. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borgstein J, Gerritsma TV, Wieringa MH, Bruce IA. The Erasmus atelectasis classification: proposal of a new classification for atelectasis of the middle ear in children. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1255–9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31805d0160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. James AL, Papsin BC, Trimble K, Ramsden J, Sanjeevan N, Bailie N, et al. Tympanic membrane retraction: an endoscopic evaluation of staging systems. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:1115–20. doi: 10.1002/lary.23203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goudy S, Lott D, Canady J, Smith RJ. Conductive hearing loss and otopathology in cleft palate patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134:946–8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.12.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flynn T, Lohmander A. A longitudinal study of hearing and middle ear status in individuals with UCLP. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:989–96. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000429. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources