Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 17:10:210-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2018.07.007. eCollection 2018 Sep 21.

A Bovine Adenoviral Vector-Based H5N1 Influenza -Vaccine Provides Enhanced Immunogenicity and Protection at a Significantly Low Dose

Affiliations

A Bovine Adenoviral Vector-Based H5N1 Influenza -Vaccine Provides Enhanced Immunogenicity and Protection at a Significantly Low Dose

Ekramy E Sayedahmed et al. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. .

Abstract

Several human and nonhuman adenovirus (AdV) vectors including bovine AdV type 3 (BAdV-3) were developed as gene delivery vectors to supplement and/or elude human AdV (HAdV)-specific neutralizing antibodies (vector immunity). Here we evaluated the vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy of BAdV-3 vector (BAd-H5HA) expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of a H5N1 influenza virus in a dose escalation study in mice with the intranasal (IN) or intramuscular (IM) route of inoculation in comparison with the HAdV type C5 (HAdV-C5) vector (HAd-H5HA) expressing HA of a H5N1 influenza virus. Dose-related increases in the immune responses were clearly noticeable. A single IM inoculation with BAd-H5HA resulted in enhanced cellular immune responses compared with that of HAd-H5HA and conferred complete protection following challenge with a heterologous H5N1 virus at the dose of 3 × 107 plaque-forming units (PFUs), whereas a significant amount of influenza virus was detected in the lungs of mice immunized with 1 × 108 PFUs of HAd-H5HA. Similarly, compared with that of HAd-H5HA, a single IN inoculation with BAd-H5HA produced significantly enhanced humoral (HA-specific immunoglobulin [IgG] and its subclasses, as well as HA-specific IgA) and cellular immune responses, and conferred complete protection following challenge with a heterologous H5N1 virus. Complete protection with BAd-H5HA was observed with the lowest vaccine dose (1 × 106 PFUs), but similar protection with HAd-H5HA was observed at the highest vaccine dose (1 × 108 PFUs). These results suggest that at least 30-fold dose sparing can be achieved with BAd-H5HA vector compared with HAd-H5HA vaccine vector.

Keywords: adenoviral vector; avian influenza; bovine adenoviral vector; dose sparing; enhanced immunogenicity and protection; human adenoviral vector; route of immunization; universal influenza vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HA Expression Levels by HAd-H5HA or BAd-H5HA in Infected Cells BHH3 cells were either mock infected or infected with HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd-H5HA, BAd-ΔE1E3, or BAd-H5HA at an MOI of 10 PFUs per cell. At 48 hr post-infection, the cells were harvested and processed for immunoblotting. HA expression was detected using an HA-specific polyclonal antibody. The expression levels of β-actin were monitored to demonstrate equal loading. The molecular weight markers in kDa are shown on the left.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HA-Specific Serum IgG Antibody Responses in Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, serum samples were collected, diluted to 1:500, and the development of HA-specific IgG antibody responses were monitored by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of the optical density (OD) readings. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ). ** or ++, significant at p < 0.01; ***, +++, or ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
HA-Specific Serum IgG1 Antibody Responses in Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, serum samples were collected, diluted to 1:500, and the development of HA-specific IgG1 antibody responses was monitored by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of the optical density (OD) readings. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ). +++ or ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
HA-Specific Serum IgG2a Antibody Responses in Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, serum samples were collected, diluted to 1:50, and the development of HA-specific IgG2a antibody responses was monitored by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of the optical density (OD) readings. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ).+, significant at p < 0.05; **, significant at p < 0.01; ***, +++, or ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
HA-Specific Serum IgG2b Antibody Responses in Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, serum samples were collected, diluted to 1:50, and the development of HA-specific IgG2b antibody responses was monitored by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of the optical density (OD) readings. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ). * or +, significant at p < 0.05; ** or ++, significant at p < 0.01; +++ or ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
HA-Specific IgA Antibody Responses in Lung Washes of Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFU of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, nasal wash samples were collected, diluted to 1:5, and the development of HA-specific IgA antibody responses was monitored by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of the optical density (OD) readings. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ). *, significant at p < 0.05; ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 7
Figure 7
HA-Specific IgA Antibody Responses in Nasal Washes of Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, lung wash samples were collected, diluted to 1:10, and the development of HA-specific IgA antibody responses was monitored by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of the optical density (OD) readings. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ). ++, significant at p < 0.01; +++ or ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 8
Figure 8
HA518 Epitope-Specific IFNγ-Secreting CD8+ T Cells in the Spleens of Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, the spleens were collected, and the splenocytes were evaluated for HA-specific cell-mediated immune responses using IFNγ-ELISpot assay. The data represent mean ± SD of the number of spot-forming units (SFUs). Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+), IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*), or BAd-H5HA vector versus HAd-H5HA vector (ψ). *, significant at p < 0.05; **, significant at p < 0.01; ***, +++, or ψψψ, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analysis was done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.
Figure 9
Figure 9
HA518 Epitope-Specific IFNγ-Secreting CD8+ T Cells in the Respiratory Lymph Nodes (RLNs) of Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, the RLNs were collected, and the pooled RLN cells were evaluated for HA-specific cell-mediated immune responses using the IFNγ-ELISpot assay. The data represent the individual replicate numbers of spot-forming units (SFUs) from pooled samples. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus.
Figure 10
Figure 10
HA518 Epitope-Specific IFNγ-Secreting CD8+ T Cells in the Inguinal Lymph Nodes (ILNs) of Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, the ILNs were collected, and the pooled ILN cells were evaluated for HA-specific cell-mediated immune responses using IFNγ-ELISpot assay. The data represent the individual replicate numbers of spot-forming units (SFUs) from pooled samples. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus.
Figure 11
Figure 11
HA518 Epitope-Specific IFNγ-Secreting CD8+ T Cells in the Lungs of Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after inoculation, the lungs were collected, and the pooled lung lymphocytes were evaluated for HA-specific cell-mediated immune responses using IFNγ-ELISpot assay. The data represent the individual replicate numbers of spot-forming units (SFUs) from pooled samples. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Lung Influenza Virus Titers in Mice Immunized Once with BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA Mice were immunized intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) once with 1 × 106 (A), 3 × 106 (B), 1 × 107 (C), 3 × 107 (D), or 1 × 108 (E) PFUs of BAd-H5HA or HAd-H5HA. For all dose groups, mice inoculated IM or IN with PBS or 1 × 108 PFUs of BAd-ΔE1E3 or HAd-ΔE1E3 served as negative or internal controls, respectively. Four weeks after immunization, mice were challenged with 100 MID50 of A/Vietnam/1203/2004(H5N1)-PR8/CDC-RG influenza virus. Three days after the challenge, mice were euthanized and the lungs were collected to determine lung virus titers. The data are shown as mean Log10 TCID50 ± SD, and the detection limit was 0.5 Log10 TCID50/mL. Statistically significant responses are shown as compared with the PBS group (+) or IN versus IM route of inoculation in the same group (*). +, significant at p < 0.05; ** or ++, significant at p < 0.01; +++, significant at p < 0.001; and **** or ++++, significant at p < 0.0001. The statistical analyses were done by Bonferroni post-test and two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6. BAd-ΔE1E3, BAd empty vector; BAd-H5HA, bovine adenoviral vector expressing hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; HAd-ΔE1E3, HAd empty vector; HAd-H5HA, human adenoviral vector expressing HA of A/Hong Kong/156/97(H5N1) influenza virus; NA, not applicable; ns, no significance at p > 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vemula S.V., Mittal S.K. Production of adenovirus vectors and their use as a delivery system for influenza vaccines. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2010;10:1469–1487. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahi Y.S., Bangari D.S., Mittal S.K. Adenoviral vector immunity: its implications and circumvention strategies. Curr. Gene Ther. 2011;11:307–320. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu J., Huang X., Yang Y. Innate immune response to adenoviral vectors is mediated by both Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent pathways. J. Virol. 2007;81:3170–3180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma A., Tandon M., Ahi Y.S., Bangari D.S., Vemulapalli R., Mittal S.K. Evaluation of cross-reactive cell-mediated immune responses among human, bovine and porcine adenoviruses. Gene Ther. 2010;17:634–642. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bangari D.S., Mittal S.K. Porcine adenoviral vectors evade preexisting humoral immunity to adenoviruses and efficiently infect both human and murine cells in culture. Virus Res. 2004;105:127–136. - PubMed