Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- PMID: 30102435
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26198
Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Abstract
As defined by the Cochrane Collaboration, a systematic review is a review of evidence with a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant primary research, and to extract and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. Meta-analysis is a statistical method to combine the results from primary studies that accounts for sample size and variability to provide a summary measure of the studied outcome. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy present unique methodological and reporting challenges not present in systematic reviews of interventions. This review provides guidance and further resources highlighting current best practices in methodology and reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy, with a specific focus on challenges and opportunities for MRI imaging. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Keywords: diagnostic test accuracy; meta-analysis; systematic review.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic performance of CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, and PET/CT for the diagnosis of colorectal liver metastasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May;47(5):1237-1250. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25852. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018. PMID: 28901685
-
Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(1):53-71. doi: 10.1159/000502821. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020. PMID: 31505492
-
Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):e002666. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002666. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25596143 Review.
-
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26360830
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19787009
Cited by
-
Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices.Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5386-5394. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06045-7. Epub 2019 Mar 21. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30899976 Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT versus PET/CT for advanced ovarian cancer staging: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jun;49(6):2135-2144. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04195-x. Epub 2024 Mar 25. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024. PMID: 38523146
-
Dietary mycotoxin exposure and human health risks: A protocol for a systematic review.Environ Int. 2024 Feb;184:108456. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108456. Epub 2024 Jan 20. Environ Int. 2024. PMID: 38277998 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2791-2801. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06559-0. Epub 2020 Jan 24. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31980881
-
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a scoping review.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Nov 1;14(11):8001-8011. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1544. Epub 2024 Oct 24. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024. PMID: 39544469 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials