Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control
- PMID: 30103071
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005
Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control
Abstract
Background: Early results of the Micra Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study and Micra Post-Approval Registry (PAR) demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy performance; however, intermediate-term results across a large patient population in the real-world setting have not been evaluated.
Objectives: We report updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker from a worldwide PAR and compare it with the IDE study as well as a transvenous historical control.
Methods: The safety objective of the analysis was system- or procedure-related major complications through 12 months postimplantation. We compared the major complication rate with that of the 726 patients from the IDE and with a reference data set of 2667 patients with transvenous pacemakers by using a Fine-Gray competing risk model.
Results: The Micra device was successfully implanted in 1801 of 1817 patients (99.1%). The mean follow-up period was 6.8 ± 6.9 months. Through 12 months, the major complication rate was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0%-3.7%). The risk of major complications for Micra PAR patients was 63% lower than that for patients with transvenous pacemakers through 12 months postimplantation (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI 0.27-0.52; P < .001). The major complication rate trended lower in the PAR than in the IDE study (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.44-1.1; P = .160), driven by the lower pericardial effusion rate in the PAR. There were 3 cases of infection associated with the procedure, but none required device removal and there were no battery or telemetry issues. Pacing thresholds were low and stable through 12 months postimplantation.
Conclusion: Performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in international clinical practice remains consistent with previously reported data. Major complications were infrequent and occurred 63% less often compared to transvenous systems.
Clinical trial registration: Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02536118; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02004873.
Keywords: Leadless pacing; Real-world performance; Transcatheter pacemaker; Transvenous pacemaker; Updated results.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Long-term performance of a transcatheter pacing system: 12-Month results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.Heart Rhythm. 2017 May;14(5):702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.035. Epub 2017 Feb 10. Heart Rhythm. 2017. PMID: 28192207 Clinical Trial.
-
A leadless pacemaker in the real-world setting: The Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry.Heart Rhythm. 2017 Sep;14(9):1375-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 11. Heart Rhythm. 2017. PMID: 28502871
-
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 30. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30784685
-
Design and evaluation of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System for bradyarrhythmia management.Future Cardiol. 2019 Jan;15(1):9-15. doi: 10.2217/fca-2018-0077. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Future Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30516083 Review.
-
Leadless Pacemakers.Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 1;119(1):145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Nov 1. Am J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 27889044 Review.
Cited by
-
Leadless or Conventional Transvenous Ventricular Permanent Pacemakers: A Nationwide Matched Control Study.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e025339. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025339. Epub 2022 Aug 5. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35929449 Free PMC article.
-
Leadless pacemaker implantation in a patient with a double-chambered right ventricle.BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Jul 15;15(7):e251496. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-251496. BMJ Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 35840166 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiopulmonary Arrest Following Micra™ Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021 Nov 15;12(11):4756-4760. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.121102. eCollection 2021 Nov. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021. PMID: 34858668 Free PMC article.
-
Leadless cardiac pacemaker implantations after infected pacemaker system removals in octogenarians.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Jul 28;18(7):505-513. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.07.006. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34404987 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to improve atrioventricular synchrony in patients with a Micra AV leadless pacemaker.Europace. 2024 Mar 1;26(3):euae060. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae060. Europace. 2024. PMID: 38449430 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical