Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 10;10(8):1064.
doi: 10.3390/nu10081064.

Narrative Review of New Methods for Assessing Food and Energy Intake

M Carolina Archundia Herrera  1 , Catherine B Chan  2   3
Affiliations
Review

Narrative Review of New Methods for Assessing Food and Energy Intake

M Carolina Archundia Herrera et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Dietary self-report instruments are essential to nutritional analysis in dietetics practice and their use in research settings has facilitated numerous important discoveries related to nutrition, health and chronic diseases. An important example is obesity, for which measuring changes in energy intake is critical for assessing efficacy of dietary interventions. However, current methods, including counting calories, estimating portion size and using food labels to estimate human energy intake have considerable constraints; consequently, research on new methodologies/technologies has been encouraged to mitigate the present weaknesses. The use of technologies has prompted innovation in dietary analysis. In this review, the strengths and limitations of new approaches have been analyzed based on ease of use, practical limitations, and statistical evaluation of reliability and validity. Their utility is discussed through the lens of the 4Ms of Obesity Assessment and Management, which has been used to evaluate root causes of obesity and help select treatment options.

Keywords: dietary assessment; energy intake; reliability; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the articles selection process and exclusion reasons.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wang H., Naghavi M., Allen C., Barber R.M., Bhutta Z.A., Carter A., Casey D.C., Charlson F.J., Chen A.Z., Coates M.M., et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1459–1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williamson D.A. Fifty years of behavioral/lifestyle interventions for overweight and obesity: Where have we been and where are we going? Obesity. 2017;25:1867–1875. doi: 10.1002/oby.21914. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das S.K., Roberts S.B., Bhapkar M.V., Villareal D.T., Fontana L., Martin C.K., Racette S.B., Fuss P.J., Kraus W.E., Wong W.W., et al. Body-composition changes in the comprehensive assessment of long-term effects of reducing intake of energy (CALERIE)-2 study: A 2-y randomized controlled trial of calorie restriction in nonobese humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;105:913–927. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.137232. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2165–2171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Look AHEAD Research Group Eight-year weight losses with an intensive lifestyle intervention: The Look AHEAD study. Obesity. 2014;22:5–13. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources