Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):391.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3318-z.

CMV on surfaces in homes with young children: results of PCR and viral culture testing

Affiliations

CMV on surfaces in homes with young children: results of PCR and viral culture testing

Minal M Amin et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Caring for young children is a known risk factor for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection mainly through exposure to their saliva and urine. In a previous study, 36 CMV-seropositive children 2 mo. to 4 years old were categorized as CMV shedders (n = 23) or non-shedders (n = 13) based on detection of CMV DNA in their saliva and urine. The current study evaluated the presence of CMV on surfaces in homes of the children.

Methods: Study staff made 4 visits to homes of the 36 enrolled children over 100 days. Saliva was collected by swabbing the mouth and urine was collected on filter paper inserted into diapers. In addition, five surface specimens were collected: three in contact with children's saliva (spoon, child's cheek, washcloth) and two in contact with children's urine (diaper changing table, mother's hand). Samples were tested by PCR and viral culture to quantify the presence of CMV DNA and viable virus.

Results: A total of 654 surface samples from 36 homes were tested; 136 were CMV DNA positive, 122 of which (90%) were in homes of the children shedding CMV (p < 0.001). Saliva-associated samples were more often CMV positive with higher viral loads than urine-associated samples. The higher the CMV viral load of the child in the home, the more home surfaces that were PCR positive (p = 0.01) and viral culture positive (p = 0.05).

Conclusions: The main source for CMV on surfaces in homes was saliva from the child in the home. Higher CMV viral loads shed by children correlated with more viable virus on surfaces which could potentially contribute to viral transmission.

Keywords: Cytomegalovirus; Infectious virus; Transmission; Viral shedding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors are from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 (except J. Stowell who recently moved to Emory University but all of her contributions to this work were during her time at CDC).

Ethics approval was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Institutional Review Board B; protocol # 6073.0. Written consent was obtained from all parents or guardians of the children who participated in the study.

Not Applicable.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CMV PCR results on specimens collected in homes of children shedding CMV. Various specimens were collected at four follow-up visits to homes over 100 days. Children living in the homes were shedding CMV when tested at the screening visit which was prior to the first follow-up and is not shown on the graph. Colored circles signify a positive result, open circles a negative result. Blue color is for saliva and its contact surfaces, yellow is for urine and its contact surfaces. At each visit, up to seven specimens were collected, as shown to the left of the chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CMV PCR results on specimens collected in homes of children not shedding CMV. Various specimens were collected at four follow-up visits to homes over 100 days. Children living in the homes were not shedding CMV when tested at the screening visit which was prior to the first follow-up and is not shown on the graph. Colored circles signify a positive result, open circles a negative result. Blue color is for saliva and its contact surfaces, yellow is for urine and its contact surfaces. At each visit, up to seven specimens were collected, as shown to the left of the chart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Viral load range for each sample type, horizontal lines represent median viral load values. Blue color is for saliva and its contact surfaces, yellow is for urine and its contact surfaces
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CMV PCR-positivity (%) of the six specimen types that are categorized according to the CMV viral load (low, medium, high) of the saliva from the child living in the home from which the specimens were collected. N = the total number of saliva specimens collected per category

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler SP. Cytomegalovirus transmission and child day care. AdvPediatrInfectDis. 1992;7:109–122. - PubMed
    1. Ross SA, Arora N, Novak Z, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Boppana SB. Cytomegalovirus reinfections in healthy seroimmune women. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(3):386–389. doi: 10.1086/649903. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall BC, Adler SP. The frequency of pregnancy and exposure to cytomegalovirus infections among women with a young child in day care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(2):163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grosjean J, Trapes L, Hantz S, Mengelle C, Virey B, Undreiner F, Messager V, Denis F, Marin B, Alain S. Human cytomegalovirus quantification in toddlers saliva from day care centers and emergency unit: a feasibility study. J Clin Virol. 2014;61(3):371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.07.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cannon MJ, Hyde TB, Schmid DS. Review of cytomegalovirus shedding in bodily fluids and relevance to congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol. 2011;21(4):240–255. doi: 10.1002/rmv.695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed