Funding models and medical dominance in interdisciplinary primary care teams: qualitative evidence from three Canadian provinces
- PMID: 30103754
- PMCID: PMC6090795
- DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0299-3
Funding models and medical dominance in interdisciplinary primary care teams: qualitative evidence from three Canadian provinces
Abstract
Background: Primary care in Canada is the first point of entry for patients needing specialized services, the fundamental source of care for those living with chronic illness, and the main supplier of preventive services. Increased pressures on the system lead to changes such as an increased reliance on interdisciplinary teams, which are advocated to have numerous advantages. The functioning of teams largely depends on inter-professional relationships that can be supported or strained by the financial arrangements within teams. We assess which types of financial environments perpetuate and which reduce the challenge of medical dominance.
Methods: Using qualitative interview data from 19 interdisciplinary teams/networks in three Canadian provinces, as well as related policy documents, we develop a typology of financial environments along two dimensions, financial hierarchy and multiplicity of funding sources. A financial hierarchy is created when the incomes of some providers are a function of the incomes of other providers. A multiplicity of funding sources is created when team funding is provided by several funders and a team faces multiple lines of accountability.
Results: We argue that medical dominance is perpetuated with higher degrees of financial hierarchy and higher degrees of multiplicity. We show that the financial environments created in the three provinces have not supported a reduction in medical dominance. The longstanding Community Health Centre model, however, displays the least financial hierarchy and the least multiplicity-an environment least fertile for medical dominance.
Conclusions: The functioning of interdisciplinary primary care teams can be negatively affected by the unique positioning of the medical profession. The financial environment created for teams is an important consideration in policy development, as it plays an important role in establishing inter-professional relationships. Policies that reduce financial hierarchies and funding multiplicities are optimal in this regard.
Conflict of interest statement
W. Dominika Wranik is an associate professor in the School of Public Administration at Dalhousie University, cross appointed with the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, and with the PhD Health Program. She obtained her PhD in Economics from the University of Manitoba. Her research focuses on the application of economic knowledge to health policies and services, specifically the implications of financial incentives for the delivery of health services.
Susan Haydt is a research facilitator in the Faculty of Management at Dalhousie University. She obtained her PhD in Sociology from Dalhousie University. Her research interests are in the sociology of professions and the politics of primary care reform and interdisciplinary primary care teams.
The study protocol, including recruitment strategies, and project information and consent forms provided to respondents were reviewed and approved by the following:
Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta—Community Health Committee
University of Manitoba—Bannatyne Campus Health Research Ethics Board
Capital Health Research Ethics Board
Colchester East Hants Research Ethics Board
Guysborough Antigonish Strait Health Authority Research Ethics Board
Pictou County Health Authority Research Ethics Board
South Shore Health Ethics Committee
All respondents signed a consent to participate in the study, including a consent to publish anonymized results.
The manuscript contains anonymized quotations from individual interview respondents. All respondents signed informed consent forms consenting to the potential publication of quotations.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Funding and remuneration of interdisciplinary primary care teams in Canada: a conceptual framework and application.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 15;17(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2290-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28506224 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and Facilitators for Primary Care Reform in Canada: Results from a Deliberative Synthesis across Five Provinces.Healthc Policy. 2015 Nov;11(2):44-57. Healthc Policy. 2015. PMID: 26742115 Free PMC article.
-
Patient, family member and caregiver engagement in shaping policy for primary health care teams in three Canadian Provinces.Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1730-1740. doi: 10.1111/hex.13516. Epub 2022 Jun 15. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 35702988 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation and impact of different funding initiatives on access to multidisciplinary primary health care and policy implications.Med J Aust. 2008 Apr 21;188(S8):S69-72. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01749.x. Med J Aust. 2008. PMID: 18429741 Review.
-
Nutrition support teams: an evidence-based practice.Nutr Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;21(1):62-7. doi: 10.1177/011542650602100162. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006. PMID: 16439771 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study.Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):307-317. doi: 10.1111/hex.13657. Epub 2022 Nov 12. Health Expect. 2023. PMID: 36370457 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of funding models on the integration of registered nurses in primary health care teams: protocol for a multi-phase mixed-methods study in Canada.BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01900-x. BMC Prim Care. 2022. PMID: 36402965 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: a narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02240-0. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38216867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"I don't see the whole picture of their health": a critical ethnography of constraints to interprofessional collaboration in end-of-life conversations in primary care.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 28;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02171-w. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37898764 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: results from a rapid scoping review.BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 4;26(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02653-5. BMC Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 39905297 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ferrante JM, Balasubramanian BA, Hudson SV, Crabtree BF. Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(2):108–16. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-06447-003. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Khan S, McIntosh C, Sanmartin C, Watson D, Leeb K. Primary health care teams and their impact on processes and outcomes of care. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2008. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-622-x/82-622-x2008002-eng.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical