Exploring causality in the association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: a large Mendelian randomisation study
- PMID: 30103784
- PMCID: PMC6090711
- DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1119-2
Exploring causality in the association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: a large Mendelian randomisation study
Abstract
Background: Whilst observational studies establish that lower plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels are associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), establishing causality has proven challenging. Since vitamin D is modifiable, these observations have substantial clinical and public health implications. Indeed, many health agencies already recommend supplemental vitamin D. Here, we explore causality in a large Mendelian randomisation (MR) study using an improved genetic instrument for circulating 25-OHD.
Methods: We developed a weighted genetic score for circulating 25-OHD using six genetic variants that we recently reported to be associated with circulating 25-OHD in a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis. Using this score as instrumental variable in MR analyses, we sought to determine whether circulating 25-OHD is causally linked with CRC risk. We conducted MR analysis using individual-level data from 10,725 CRC cases and 30,794 controls (Scotland, UK Biobank and Croatia). We then applied estimates from meta-analysis of 11 GWAS of CRC risk (18,967 cases; 48,168 controls) in a summary statistics MR approach.
Results: The new genetic score for 25-OHD was strongly associated with measured plasma 25-OHD levels in 2821 healthy Scottish controls (P = 1.47 × 10- 11), improving upon previous genetic instruments (F-statistic 46.0 vs. 13.0). However, individual-level MR revealed no association between 25-OHD score and CRC risk (OR 1.03/unit log-transformed circulating 25-OHD, 95% CI 0.51-2.07, P = 0.93). Similarly, we found no evidence for a causal relationship between 25-OHD and CRC risk using summary statistics MR analysis (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69-1.19, P = 0.48).
Conclusions: Despite the scale of this study and employing an improved score capturing more of the genetic contribution to circulating 25-OHD, we found no evidence for a causal relationship between circulating 25-OHD and CRC risk. Although the magnitude of effect for vitamin D suggested by observational studies can confidently be excluded, smaller effects sizes and non-linear relationships remain plausible. Circulating vitamin D may be a CRC biomarker, but a causal effect on CRC risk remains unproven.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Mendelian randomisation; Vitamin D.
Conflict of interest statement
SOCCS received ethical and management approvals from the MultiCentre Research Ethics committee for Scotland (approval number MREC/ 01/0/5), 18 Local Research Ethics committees, 18 Caldicott guardians and 16 NHS Trust management committees.
GS:SFHS: 05/S1401/89 Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics A, Generic Research Tissue Bank approval: GS:SFHS: 10/S1402/20 Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics B.
Ethics permission for the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 (LBC1921) was obtained from the Lothian Research Ethics Committee (LREC/1998/4/183).
Ethics permission for the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936) was obtained from the Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee for Scotland (MREC/01/0/56) and the Lothian Research Ethics Committee (LREC/2003/2/29).
The research activities of UK Biobank were approved by the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (11/NW/0382) in relation to the process of participant invitation, assessment and follow-up procedures. Additionally, ethics approvals from the National Information Governance Board for Health & Social Care in England and Wales and approval from the Community Health Index Advisory Group in Scotland were also obtained to gain access to the information that would allow the invitation of participants. This study did not need to recontact the participants, and no separate ethics approval was required according to the Ethics and Governance Framework (EGF) of UK Biobank. The approved data request application ID for this analysis is 7441.
No consent for publication was required.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- Cross HS. Vitamin D: synthesis and catabolism- considerations for Cancer causation and therapy. In: Trump DL, Johnson CS, editors. Vitamin D and Cancer. New York: Springer New York; 2011. pp. 1–24.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 22804/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- R35 CA197449/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- MR/M004007/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_QA137853/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 12076/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 16459/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- MR/K026992/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_U127527198/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MR/K018647/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- 18927/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- MC_PC_U127561128/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom
- G0600237/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- G0600329/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_00007/10/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_UU_00007/1/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- BB/F019394/1/BB_/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom
- MC_PC_U127527198/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
- C348/A18927/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- U01 CA167551/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- C31250/A22804/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- MC_PC_17228/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
