Dietary fibre: consensus and controversy
- PMID: 3010380
Dietary fibre: consensus and controversy
Abstract
Technological advances have reduced and refined man's plant food intake and consequently brought about an unprecedented decline in his consumption of dietary fibre (DF). The emergence of certain diseases selectively in regions which have been affected the most by this dietary change has led to an enhanced awareness of the functions of DF. DF is a heterogeneous group of substances which resist digestion by the endogenous enzymes of the human gut, although they are fermented to a substantial extent by the bacterial flora of the large intestine. Chemically, DF essentially consists of nonstarch polysaccharides and lignin, and its major constituents are cellulose, hemicelluose, lignin and pectin. The physiological effects of DF are attributable largely to its physicochemical properties. DF primarily affects gastrointestinal (GI) function; its effects are observable at all stages from ingestion through defaecation. It restricts caloric intake, shows gastric and small intestinal transit, and affects the activity of digestive enzymes and release of GI hormones. Its overall impact is to reduce apparent digestibility of nutrients marginally but consistently. In the large intestine, DF accelerates transit, supports bacterial growth and serves to hold water. As a result, the faecal weight and water content increase, and the transit time generally becomes shorter. Secondary to its GI effects, DF attenuates postprandial glycaemia and has long term effects on glucose tolerance and lipoprotein metabolism. These effects have important implications in the aetiopathogenesis of constipation and its sequelae including diverticulosis, cholesterol gallstones, colorectal cancer, obesity, diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. DF has traditionally been used therapeutically for constipation; now its use in diabetes is also well established. Our appreciation of the role of DF in human nutrition has undergone a major change in the last two decades. From a redundant constituent of plant foods, it has now moved to the position of an essential nutrient, the deficiency of which seems to have serious consequences.
Similar articles
-
Physiological aspects of energy metabolism and gastrointestinal effects of carbohydrates.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;61 Suppl 1:S40-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602938. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007. PMID: 17992186 Review.
-
Influence of dietary fiber on luminal environment and morphology in the small and large intestine of sows.J Anim Sci. 2008 Sep;86(9):2217-27. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-062. Epub 2008 Feb 29. J Anim Sci. 2008. PMID: 18310497
-
Dietary fiber--in historical perspective.J Am Diet Assoc. 1976 Nov;69(5):498-505. J Am Diet Assoc. 1976. PMID: 789439 Review.
-
Digestion of carbohydrates and utilization of energy in sows fed diets with contrasting levels and physicochemical properties of dietary fiber.J Anim Sci. 2008 Sep;86(9):2208-16. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-060. Epub 2008 Feb 29. J Anim Sci. 2008. PMID: 18310490
-
Effects of GI vs content of cereal fibre of the evening meal on glucose tolerance at a subsequent standardized breakfast.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;62(6):712-20. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602784. Epub 2007 May 23. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID: 17522615 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Prebiotic content of bread prepared with flour from immature wheat grain and selected dextran-producing lactic acid bacteria.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jun;79(12):3779-85. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00502-13. Epub 2013 Apr 12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23584774 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous