Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 13;190(32):E949-E956.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170932.

Rapid repeat pregnancy among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a population-based cohort study

Affiliations

Rapid repeat pregnancy among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a population-based cohort study

Hilary K Brown et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Rapid repeat pregnancy within 12 months of a live birth is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. We evaluated the risk for rapid repeat pregnancy among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities, with whom sharing of information about pregnancy planning and contraception may be inadequate.

Methods: We accessed population-based health administrative data for all women with an index live birth in Ontario, Canada, for the period 2002-2013. We used modified Poisson regression to compare relative risks (RRs) for a rapid repeat pregnancy within 12 months of the index live birth in women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities, first adjusting for demographic factors and then additionally adjusting for social, health and health care disparities.

Results: We compared 2855 women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and 923 367 women without such disabilities. At the index live birth, women with intellectual and developmental disabilities were more likely to be younger than 25 years of age (46.8% v. 18.2%) and to be disadvantaged on each measure of social, health and health care disparities. These women had a higher rate of rapid repeat pregnancy than those without such disabilities (7.6% v. 3.9%; adjusted RR 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.54, after controlling for demographic factors). This risk was attenuated upon further adjustment for social, health and health care disparities (adjusted RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14).

Interpretation: Rapid repeat pregnancy, which was more common among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities, may be explained by social, health and health care disparities. To optimize reproductive health, multifactorial approaches to address the marginalization experienced by this population are likely needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Cumulative incidence of rapid repeat pregnancy occurring within 12 months of a prior live birth, among women with (thick dashed line) and without (dotted line) intellectual and developmental disabilities. To avoid misclassification of complications from the index live birth as a rapid repeat pregnancy, rapid repeat pregnancies were counted starting at 3 months after the index live birth. Because of the small number of events among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities, the data for 3 and 4 months are combined, to protect individuals’ privacy.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Adjusted risk of rapid repeat pregnancy occurring within 12 months of a prior live birth among women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs), stratified by factors expected to directly affect the risk of rapid repeat pregnancy. Data are presented as number (%) of rapid repeat pregnancies among women with and without IDDs, adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations, and p values for interaction terms between disability status and effect modifiers. Adjusted stratified models controlled for all variables except that used for stratification, from among age, parity, urban residence, neighbourhood income quintile, social assistance, stable and unstable chronic medical conditions, mental illness and continuity of primary care. Note: ref = reference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wendt A, Gibbs CM, Peters S, et al. Impact of increasing inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and infant health. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012;26(Suppl 1):239–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006;295:1809–23. - PubMed
    1. Gemmill A, Lindberg LD. Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:64–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boardman LA, Allsworth J, Phipps MG, et al. Risk factors for unintended versus intended rapid repeat pregnancies among adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2006;39:597.e1–8. - PubMed
    1. Appareddy S, Pryor J, Bailey B. Inter-pregnancy interval and adverse outcomes: evidence for an additional risk in health disparate populations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:2640–4. - PubMed

Publication types