Early detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: a case-control study in primary care
- PMID: 30104326
- PMCID: PMC6104875
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X698357
Early detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: a case-control study in primary care
Abstract
Background: Multiple myeloma is a haematological cancer characterised by numerous non-specific symptoms leading to diagnostic delay in a large proportion of patients.
Aim: To identify which blood tests are useful in suggesting or excluding a diagnosis of myeloma.
Design and setting: A matched case-control study set in UK primary care using routinely collected data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
Method: Symptom prevalence and blood tests were analysed up to 5 years before diagnosis in 2703 cases and 12 157 matched controls. Likelihood ratios (LR) were used to classify tests or their combinations as useful rule-in tests (LR+ = ≥5), or rule-out tests (LR- = ≤0.2).
Results: Raised plasma viscosity (PV) had an LR+ = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7 to 2.3; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 1.9, 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.0; and C-reactive protein (CRP) 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.4. A normal haemoglobin had an LR- = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.45; calcium LR- = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.83; and creatinine LR- = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.83. The test combination with the lowest LR- was all normal haemoglobin with calcium and PV, which had an LR- = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.18, though the LR- for normal haemoglobin and PV together was 0.12 (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.23).
Conclusion: Plasma viscosity and ESR are better for both ruling in and ruling out the disease compared with C-reactive protein. A combination of a normal ESR or PV and normal haemoglobin is a simple rule-out approach for patients currently being tested in primary care.
Keywords: blood; case–control studies; diagnosis; inflammatory; multiple myeloma; primary care.
© British Journal of General Practice 2018.
Figures
Comment in
-
Electronic patient records research to aid diagnostic reasoning for possible cancer in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):408-409. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698585. Br J Gen Pract. 2018. PMID: 30166371 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lyratzopoulos G, Neal RD, Barbiere JM, et al. Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):353–365. - PubMed
-
- Lyratzopoulos G, Wardle J, Rubin G. Rethinking diagnostic delay in cancer: how difficult is the diagnosis? BMJ. 2014;349:g7400. - PubMed
-
- Kariyawasan CC, Hughes DA, Jayatillake MM, Mehta AB. Multiple myeloma: causes and consequences of delay in diagnosis. QJM. 2007;100(10):635–640. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous