Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756):20170288.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0288.

An intraspecific appraisal of the social intelligence hypothesis

Affiliations
Review

An intraspecific appraisal of the social intelligence hypothesis

Benjamin J Ashton et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The prevailing hypotheses for the evolution of cognition focus on either the demands associated with group living (the social intelligence hypothesis (SIH)) or ecological challenges such as finding food. Comparative studies testing these hypotheses have generated highly conflicting results; consequently, our understanding of the drivers of cognitive evolution remains limited. To understand how selection shapes cognition, research must incorporate an intraspecific approach, focusing on the causes and consequences of individual variation in cognition. Here, we review the findings of recent intraspecific cognitive research to investigate the predictions of the SIH. Extensive evidence from our own research on Australian magpies (Cracticus tibicen dorsalis), and a number of other taxa, suggests that individuals in larger social groups exhibit elevated cognitive performance and, in some cases, elevated reproductive fitness. Not only do these findings demonstrate how the social environment has the potential to shape cognitive evolution, but crucially, they demonstrate the importance of considering both genetic and developmental factors when attempting to explain the causes of cognitive variation.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.

Keywords: Australian magpies; cognition; individual variation; intraspecific; social intelligence hypothesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) An Australian magpie interacting with a cognitive task, and (b) the relationship between group size and general cognitive performance. Reproduced with permission from Ashton et al. [67]. (Online version in colour.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dunbar RIM, Shultz S. 2007. Evolution in the social brain. Science 317, 1344–1347. (10.1126/science.1145463) - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeCasien AR, Williams SA, Higham JP. 2017. Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0112 (10.1038/s41559-017-0112) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sayol F, Maspons J, Lapiedra O, Iwaniuk AN, Székely T, Sol D. 2016. Environmental variation and the evolution of large brains in birds. Nat. Commun. 7, 13 971 (10.1038/ncomms13971) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosati AG. 2017. Foraging cognition: reviving the ecological intelligence hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 691–702. (10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.011) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sol D. 2009. The cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains. In Cognitive ecology II (eds Dukas R, Ratcliffe JM), pp. 111–136. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources