Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):237-241.
doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_72_17.

Pre-emptive caudal epidural analgesia with ropivacaine for lumbosacral spine surgery: A randomized case control study

Affiliations

Pre-emptive caudal epidural analgesia with ropivacaine for lumbosacral spine surgery: A randomized case control study

Navneh Samagh et al. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background and aims: Pre-emptive analgesia using caudal epidural technique is an underutilized technique in lumbosacral spine surgery patients. We intend to study if pre-emptive analgesia with a single caudal epidural injection of ropivacaine is an effective method of postoperative analgesia by assessing the quality and duration of pain relief and intraoperative opioid requirement.

Material and methods: Eighty patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgeries by the posterior approach were randomized to ropivacaine (R) group (n = 40) and saline (S) group (n = 40). Patients in R group received caudal epidural injection of 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine for surgeries at or below L5 lumbar spine and 25 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine for surgeries between L2 and L5 lumbar spine. Patients in S group received similar amounts of normal saline. Patients were monitored in the immediate postoperative period and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours for pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) scale. Time to rescue analgesia and intraoperative fentanyl requirement were noted.

Results: The demographics, duration of anesthesia, and hemodynamic variables were comparable in both groups. The mean intraoperative fentanyl requirement (P = 0.001) and mean VAS scores were significantly lower in the R group in the immediate postoperative period, (P < 0.001), 4 hours (P < 0.001), 8 hours (P = 0.009), 12 hours (P = 0.007), and 24 hours (P = 0.046) postoperatively. The mean time to rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the R group (P < 0.001) compared to S group. No hemodynamic or neurological side-effects were observed in the groups.

Conclusion: Pre-emptive analgesia with caudal epidural injection of ropivacaine is a safe and effective method of postoperative analgesia.

Keywords: Analgesia; anesthesia; caudal; epidural; ropivacaine; spine; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of mean heart rate at different time points between ropivacaine and saline groups
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of mean systolic blood pressure at different time points between ropivacaine and saline groups
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of mean diastolic blood pressure at different time points between ropivacaine and saline groups
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of mean visual analogue scale at different time points between ropivacaine and saline groups

References

    1. Woolf CJ. Recent advances on the pathophysiology of acute pain. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63:139–46. - PubMed
    1. Bolay H, Moskowitz MA. Mechanisms of pain modulation in chronic syndromes. Neurology. 2002;59:S2–S7. - PubMed
    1. Al Oweidi AS, Klasen J, Al-Mustafa MM, Abu-Halaweh SA, Al-Zaben KR, Massad IM, et al. The impact of long-lasting preemptive epidural analgesia before total hip replacement on the hormonal stress response. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010;20:679–84. - PubMed
    1. Woolf CJ, Chong MS. Preemptive analgesia-treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:362–79. - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H. Surgical stress: The role of pain and analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63:189–95. - PubMed