Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Nov 1;21(11):979-987.
doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy074.

The Effects of Add-on Fronto-Temporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, Other Psychopathological Symptoms, and Insight in Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Chuan-Chia Chang  1 , Nian-Sheng Tzeng  1   2 , Che-Yi Chao  3 , Chin-Bin Yeh  1 , Hsin-An Chang  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effects of Add-on Fronto-Temporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, Other Psychopathological Symptoms, and Insight in Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Chuan-Chia Chang et al. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation in treating auditory verbal hallucinations and other psychopathological symptoms of schizophrenia patients has been examined in a small number of clinical trials with limited sample sizes, but the results are mixed. Fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation has also been demonstrated to enhance patients' insight into their mental illness in an open-label pilot study. The current investigation aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation on the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations, other schizophrenia symptoms, and insight in a large double blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Methods: Sixty patients with medication-refractory auditory verbal hallucinations were randomized over 2 conditions: transcranial direct current stimulation with 2-mA, twice-daily sessions for 5 consecutive days, with anodal stimulation to the left prefrontal cortex and cathodal stimulation to the left temporo-parietal junction, and sham treatment.

Results: Fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation failed to cause significant changes in the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations and other schizophrenia symptoms. The levels of insight into illness (effect size=0.511, P<.001) and positive symptoms (effect size=0.781, P<.001) were largely promoted by 5 days of transcranial direct current stimulation relative to sham treatment. The beneficial effects on the 2 insight dimensions remained 1 month after transcranial direct current stimulation.

Conclusions: Fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation is not more effective for auditory verbal hallucinations and other schizophrenia symptoms than sham treatment. But the results of transcranial direct current stimulation-associated improvement in awareness of illness and positive symptoms show promise and provide a new direction for future research into insight promotion interventions in schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the participant progress through the phases of the present randomized trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The mean percentage changes in scores of Auditory hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS) between active stimulation group and sham group across the 4 assessments. Error bars indicated the SE. Posthoc analyses were undertaken to examine between-group difference at each post-baseline assessment with P <.005 (0.05/10) considered significant. *P<.005; **P<.001.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The mean percentage changes in the awareness of the disease dimension scores of the abbreviated version of the Scale to Assess Unawareness in Mental Disorder in schizophrenia (SUMD) between active stimulation group and sham group across the 4 assessments. Other descriptions are as in Figure 2.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The mean percentage changes in the awareness of positive symptoms dimension scores of the abbreviated version of the Scale to Assess Unawareness in Mental Disorder in schizophrenia (SUMD) between active stimulation group and sham group across the 4 assessments. Other descriptions are as in Figure 2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agarwal SM, Bose A, Shivakumar V, Narayanaswamy JC, Chhabra H, Kalmady SV, Varambally S, Nitsche MA, Venkatasubramanian G, Gangadhar BN(2016)Impact of antipsychotic medication on transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) effects in schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Res 235:97–103. - PubMed
    1. Alderson-Day B, McCarthy-Jones S, Fernyhough C(2015)Hearing voices in the resting brain: a review of intrinsic functional connectivity research on auditory verbal hallucinations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 55:78–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amador XF, Strauss DH, Yale SA, Flaum MM, Endicott J, Gorman JM(1993)Assessment of insight in psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 150:873–879. - PubMed
    1. Antonius D, Prudent V, Rebani Y, D’Angelo D, Ardekani BA, Malaspina D, Hoptman MJ(2011)White matter integrity and lack of insight in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Schizophr Res 128:76–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergé D, Carmona S, Rovira M, Bulbena A, Salgado P, Vilarroya O(2011)Gray matter volume deficits and correlation with insight and negative symptoms in first-psychotic-episode subjects. Acta Psychiatr Scand 123:431–439. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances