Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 14;18(1):196.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1287-y.

The impact of rural outreach programs on medical students' future rural intentions and working locations: a systematic review

George E Johnson  1 , Fredrick Clive Wright  2   3 , Kirsty Foster  4
Affiliations

The impact of rural outreach programs on medical students' future rural intentions and working locations: a systematic review

George E Johnson et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Significant investment has been undertaken by many countries into 'Rural Clinical Training Placement Schemes' for medical students in order to deal with shortages of trained health care professionals in rural and remote locations. This systematic review examines the evidence base of rural educational programs within medical education and focusses on workforce intentions and employment outcomes. The study provides a detailed description of the methodological characteristics of the literature, thematic workforce outcomes and key related factors are identified, study quality is assessed, and the findings are compared within an international context.

Methods: A systematic review looking at international literature of rural placement programs within medical education between January 2005 to January 2017 from databases including; Medline, Embase, NursingOVID, PubMed and Cochrane. The study adopted the PRISMA protocol. A quality assessment of the literature was conducted based on the Health Gains Notation Framework.

Results: Sixty two papers met the inclusion criteria. The review identified three program classifications; Rural Clinical Placement Programs, Rural Clinical Placement Programs combined with a rural health educational curriculum component and Rural Clinical School Programs. The studies included were from Australia, United States, Canada, New Zealand, Thailand and Africa. Questionnaires and tracking or medical registry databases were the most commonly reported research tools and the majority were volunteer programs. Most studies identified potential rural predictors/confounders, however a number did not apply control groups and most programs were based on a single site. There was a clear discrepancy in the ideal rural clinical placement length. Outcomes themes were identified related to rural workforce outcomes. Most studies reported that an organised, well-funded, rural placement or rural clinical school program produced positive associations with increased rural intentions and actual graduate rural employment.

Conclusions: Future research should focus on large scale methodologically rigorous multi-site rural program studies, with longitudinal follow up of graduates working locations. Studies should apply pre-and post-intervention surveys to measure change in attitudes and control for predictive confounders, control groups should be applied; and in-depth qualitative research should be considered to explore the specific factors of programs that are associated with encouraging rural employment.

Keywords: Employment outcomes; Medical education; Medical students; Rural intentions; Rural placement programs; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

‘Not applicable’.

Consent for publication

‘Not applicable’.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Search Strategy applied in Ovid MEDLINE (example of search strategy)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Systematic review flowchart of the literature search and selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Australian Government, The Department of Health. In: National strategic framework for rural and remote health. 2016. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/national-s.... Accessed 1 July 2017.
    1. The Sentinel Watch American Sentinel University. In: Health disparities continue to plague rural areas. 2016. http://www.americansentinel.edu/blog/2016/07/26/health-disparities-conti.... Accessed 1 July 2017.
    1. Laven GA, Laurence COM, Wilkinson D, Beilby JJ. National Rural Health Conference. In: Using the Australian rural background study to inform rural and remote multidisciplinary health workforce planning research. Central to health: sustaining well-being in remote and rural Australia. Alice Springs, NT: Proceedings of the 8th National Rural Health Conference. 2005. https://ruralhealth.org.au/8thNRHC/Papers/laven,%20gillian.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2017.
    1. Ricketts TC. Workforce issues in rural areas: a focus on policy equity. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:42–48. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047597. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renner DM, Westfall JM, Wilroy LA, Ginde AA. The influence of loan repayment on rural healthcare provider recruitment and retention in Colorado. Rural Remote Health 2010;10:1605. http://www.rrh.org.au/publishedarticles/article_print_1605.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2017. - PubMed

Publication types