Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;22(1):91-100.
doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0070-9. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

Prostate cancer risk factors in black and white men in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Affiliations

Prostate cancer risk factors in black and white men in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Tracy M Layne et al. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: There are few prospective studies comparing race-specific associations between diet, nutrients, and health-related parameters, and prostate cancer risk.

Methods: Race-specific prostate cancer risk associations were examined among men in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study. We identified 1417 cases among black men (209 advanced), and 28,845 among white men (3898 advanced). Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also evaluated the cumulative change in the HR for black race following adjustment for each factor.

Results: Race-specific prostate cancer associations were similar in black and white men across disease subtypes only for history of diabetes (overall : HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90 and HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.69-0.76, respectively; Pinteraction = 0.66). By contrast, there was a positive risk association with height for white men and inverse for black men (Pinteraction: non-advanced = 0.01; advanced = 0.04). This difference remained among men with at least 2 years of follow-up for non-advanced (Pinteraction = 0.01), but not advanced disease (Pinteraction = 0.24); or after adjustment for prostate cancer screening (non-advanced Pinteraction = 0.53, advanced Pinteraction = 0.31). The only other evidence of interaction with race was observed for dietary vitamin D intake and non-advanced disease, but only after adjustment for screening (Pinteraction = 0.02). Cumulative adjustment for each factor increased the HR for black race by 32.9% for overall cancer and 12.4% for advanced disease.

Conclusions: Our data suggest few of the dietary, nutrient, and health-related factors associated with prostate cancer risk in predominantly non-Hispanic white men were associated with risk in black men, and adjustment for these factors widen the black-white difference in risk. Larger studies of black men, particularly with prospective data, are needed to help identify risk factors relevant to this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The cumulative change in the hazard ratio for the association between black race and risk of overall and advanced prostate cancer after adjustment. The initial model had an indicator variable for black vs. white race alone, followed by adjustment for age, and then family history of prostate cancer. Each diet and health-related factor was subsequently added to the model based on the order identified using forward selection; starting with diabetes and ending with either dairy or dietary vitamin D. Due to high correlation (correlation coefficient ≥0.70), models with dairy and dietary vitamin D are mutually exclusive. The total cumulative change is the percentage change in the hazard ratio between the race alone vs. the final cumulative model (ending with dairy)

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans 2016–2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2016.
    1. Chornokur G, Dalton K, Borysova ME, Kumar NB. Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011;71:985–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freedland SJ, Isaacs WB. Explaining racial differences in prostate cancer in the United States: sociology or biology? Prostate. 2005;62:243–52. - PubMed
    1. Jones BA, Liu WL, Araujo AB, Kasl SV, Silvera SN, Soler-Vila H, et al. Explaining the race difference in prostate cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:2825–34. - PubMed

Publication types