Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 6:4:21.
doi: 10.1038/s41420-018-0089-7. eCollection 2018.

Downregulated circulating microRNAs after surgery: potential noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of early breast cancer

Affiliations

Downregulated circulating microRNAs after surgery: potential noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of early breast cancer

Yaohui Wang et al. Cell Death Discov. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Success in curing breast cancer largely depends on the stage at diagnosis. Circulating microRNAs are becoming a promising noninvasive biomarker. We postulate that a postoperative decline in circulating microRNAs might have diagnostic and prognostic value. Applying high-throughput microarrays, we screened the dysregulated microRNAs in paired serum samples before and after surgery. The relative concentrations of putative markers between the early breast cancer and cancer-free groups were evaluated in the training set and verified in the validation set. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess diagnostic value. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model. Five microRNAs significantly reduced after surgery were selected for the training set. We found that miR-130b-5p, miR-151a-5p, miR-206, and miR-222-3p were significantly higher in the breast cancer group. Each of the four microRNAs had potential diagnostic value. The combined four microRNAs (training set: area under the curve (AUC) 0.8457; validation set: AUC 0.9309) had better diagnostic value than each single microRNA. MiR-222-3p was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (HR = 13.19; 95% CI, 1.06-163.59; P = 0.045). Patients with no fewer than three highly expressed miRNAs had shorter DFS than patients with 0-2 highly expressed miRNAs (HR = 2.293; 95% CI, 1.128-0.662; P = 0.022). Our findings indicate that postoperatively downregulated circulating miR-130b-5p, miR-151a-5p, miR-206, and miR-222-3p may be potential biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Heat map and hierarchical clustering of downregulated miRNA expression signatures compared postoperative with preoperative signatures in nine matched-pair breast cancer patients’ samples.
Each row represents a miRNA, and each column represents a sample. The miRNA clustering tree is shown on the left. The color scale shown on the top illustrates the relative expression level of a miRNA in a certain slide: red color represents a high relative expression level and green color represents a low relative expression level. Those miRNAs whose fold change is more than 1.5 and P value less than 0.05 are listed here
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the four miRNAs for detecting breast cancer.
(A) ROC curve analysis of combined miR-130b-5p,miR-151a-5p,miR-206 and miR-222-3p in the training set (AUC 0.8457,sensitivity 85.00%, specificity 65.22%). (B) ROC curve analysis of combined miR-130b-5p,miR-151a-5p,miR-206 and miR-222-3p in the validation set (AUC 0.9309,sensitivity 84.31%, specificity 83.33%).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve for disease-free survival in the breast cancer patients.
(A) Analysis by the expression of miR-222-3p. (B) Analysis by the number of highly expressed miRNAs.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan HG, Malmgren JA, Atwood MK, Calip GS. Effect of treatment and mammography detection on breast cancer survival over time: 1990-2007. Cancer. 2015;121:2553–2561. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29371. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massat NJ, et al. Explaining the better prognosis of screening-exposed breast cancers: influence of tumor characteristics and treatment. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016;25:479–487. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N., et al. (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2010. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/, based on November 2012 SEER data submission,posted to the SEER web site (April 2013).
    1. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1998–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources