Evaluation of Information Sources in Plastic Surgery Decision-making
- PMID: 30109166
- PMCID: PMC6084688
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2773
Evaluation of Information Sources in Plastic Surgery Decision-making
Abstract
Background Today, patients can access a myriad of information sources regarding plastic surgery procedures prior to meeting with a surgeon. Despite their widespread use, the role of these sources in a patient's decision-making remains undefined. We hypothesized that the physician remains the key information source for patients making surgical decisions in plastic surgery, but that other sources may deliver important insights and prove helpful to varying degrees. We also explored motivations for this outside information search and any differences in perceived value among patients. Methods We administered a survey regarding various information sources to our breast reconstruction, reduction, and abdominoplasty patients. Responses were compared between surgery groups and demographic groups. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to determine the impact of patient characteristics on helpfulness rank of different sources. Results Survey results were obtained from 58 patients, of whom 10 (17.2%) had abdominoplasty, 35 (60.3%) breast reconstruction, and 13 (22.4%) breast reduction. The most popular information sources prior to the first surgical appointment were Internet searches (56.9%) and family/friends/other patients (39.7%). After the initial appointment, the most useful sources were plastic surgeons (84.5%), and the Internet (36.2%). Most patients (73.5%) still sought outside information after their appointment. On a Likert-type scale of helpfulness, plastic surgeons ranked 4.28/5, followed by the web-based patient education platform, 3.73 and the Internet, 3.6. A total of 63% of participants listed plastic surgeons as their single most important source of information. In ordinal logistic regression analysis, non-white race was significantly associated with higher rank of surgeon helpfulness (p < 0.05). Relative to low-income patients, income $50-100k (p < 0.05) and $100k+ (p < 0.05) were associated with lower rank of surgeon helpfulness. Conclusions Most patients seek outside information prior to visiting with a surgeon from the Internet, social media, or family and friends. Patients consider plastic surgeons their most valuable information source overall, though still in need of supplementation for varying reasons. Additionally, certain demographic differences affect patient perception of information sources, and this is an important factor for surgeons to consider as they approach educating patients.
Keywords: informed consent; internet; patient education; patient satisfaction; plastic surgery information sources; web-based education.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation.Aesthet Surg J. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):395-403. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10374101. Aesthet Surg J. 2010. PMID: 20601563
-
[Patients' decision for aesthetic surgery].Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011 Dec;43(6):368-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286252. Epub 2012 Jan 12. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011. PMID: 22241520 German.
-
Cosmetic Surgeon Representation: Ensuring Board Certification Transparency and Patient Awareness.Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S431-S436. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001430. Ann Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29668511
-
Which Groups of Plastic Surgery Patients Are Impacted by Social Media Use? An In-Depth Review of Social Media Engagement.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Apr 1;153(4):824e-837e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010641. Epub 2023 May 15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 37184509 Review.
-
Creating Value in Plastic Surgery.Semin Plast Surg. 2018 Nov;32(4):187-190. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672207. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Semin Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 30357065 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
COVID-19 and Digital Health: Evolution, Perspectives and Opportunities.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148519. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35886366 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating Patient Empowerment and Nurses' Use of Digital Strategies: eSurvey Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 18;18(18):9844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189844. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34574766 Free PMC article.
-
The 3-Level Approach to Facelift Planning: A Simple Paradigm for Surgical Rejuvenation of the Face.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar;48(6):1076-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03840-y. Epub 2024 Jan 23. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38263497
-
Which Resources Are Better: Sales or Scholarly? An Assessment on the Readability, Quality, and Technical Features of Online Chemical Peel Websites.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021 Mar 4;3(1):ojab008. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojab008. eCollection 2021 Jan. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021. PMID: 33824950 Free PMC article.
-
Operation Diversify Plastic Surgery: An Innovative Strategy to Increase Diversity in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Sep 7;11(9):e5236. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005236. eCollection 2023 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023. PMID: 37691709 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Falagas ME, Korbila IP, Giannopoulou KP, Kondilis BK, Peppas G. Am J Surg. 2009;198:420–435. - PubMed
-
- Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ Jr, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:106–114. - PubMed
-
- Decision-making in breast cancer surgery: where do patients go for information? Schmidt H, Cohen A, Mandeli J, Weltz C, Port ER. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sesc/tas/2016/00000082/00000005/ar.... Am Surg. 2016;82:397–402. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources