Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant: Technique, Preliminary Results and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome
- PMID: 30109537
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6704-2
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant: Technique, Preliminary Results and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome
Abstract
Background: Experience with application of a robotic surgery platform in the management of breast cancer is limited. The preliminary results of the robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with Gel implant procedure are reported.
Methods: The medical records of patients from a single institution who underwent an R-NSM and IBR with Gel implant procedure for breast cancer during the period March 2017 to February 2018 were assessed. Data on clinicopathologic characteristics, type of surgery, complications, and recurrence were analyzed to determine the effectiveness and oncologic safety of R-NSM. Patient-reported cosmetic outcome results were obtained.
Results: A total of 22 patients who received 23 R-NSM and IBR with Gel implant procedures were analyzed. The mean operation time for R-NSM was 118.8 ± 50.6 min, and 74.5 ± 26.6 min for Gel implant reconstruction. Docking time quickly dropped from 20 to 6-8 min, and the time needed to complete R-NSM was usually completed within 100 min after accumulation of case experience. Mean blood loss was 37 ± 38.2 mL, and the positive surgical margin rate was 0%. Three (13%) patients had transit nipple ischemia change, and no total nipple-areolar complex necrosis cases were observed. No local recurrence or mortality was found during a mean 6.9 ± 3.5 months of follow-up. All 22 patients were satisfied with the postoperative aesthetic outcome.
Conclusion: From our preliminary experience, R-NSM and IBR with Gel implant is a safe procedure, with good cosmetic results, and could be a promising new technique for breast cancer patients indicated for mastectomy.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus conventional nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate gel implant breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- A case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcome, medical cost, and patient-reported cosmetic results.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Aug;73(8):1514-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 18. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020. PMID: 32238306
-
The learning curve of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: An analysis of consecutive 39 procedures with cumulative sum plot.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;45(2):125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 17. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30360987
-
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant.Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):53-54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6711-3. Epub 2018 Aug 25. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30145648 No abstract available.
-
Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a comparative analysis with conventional and endoscopic techniques through a systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2025 May 16;19(1):220. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02388-0. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40377824 Review.
-
Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.Surg Today. 2021 Jun;51(6):862-871. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02175-4. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Surg Today. 2021. PMID: 33185799 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic mastectomy: the next major advance in breast cancer surgery?Br J Surg. 2021 Apr 5;108(3):233-234. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab010. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 33723570 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Robotic Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 4;11:637049. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637049. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33747960 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: meta-analysis.Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad336. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad336. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37890072 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Prospectively Designed Multicenter Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes, Medical Cost, and Patient-reported Outcomes (RCENSM-P).Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):138-146. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005924. Epub 2023 May 25. Ann Surg. 2024. PMID: 37226826 Free PMC article.
-
Robotics in Breast Surgery: Current Advantages, Disadvantages, and Applications.Cureus. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):e87972. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87972. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40821160 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical