Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Aug 9:26:e2937.
doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1920.2937.

Effectiveness of nursing intervention for increasing hope in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of nursing intervention for increasing hope in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Ping Li et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. .

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of nursing interventions to increase the level of hope in cancer patients, in a meta-analysis.

Methods: electronic databases were searched. Two of the authors independently extracted data from the eligible studies, and Stata 13.0 software was used to pool the data.

Results: nine randomized controlled trials were included, and methodological quality of each randomized controlled trial (RCT) was evaluated using Cochrane handbook recommendations. A random effects model was used to combine results from eligible studies. The pooled results using the fixed effects model showed that scores to first effects increase significantly after the use of nursing intervention between the groups. Heterogeneity was observed among the studies for posttest (df = 8, P = 0.000; I2 =76.1 %). The results indicated significant heterogeneity across the nine selected studies. The test for heterogeneity showed no homogeneity among studies for follow-up (df = 8, P = 0.328; I2 = 12.9 %), and there was no statistical significance.

Conclusion: the current evidence suggests that nursing intervention has a positive effect on hope in cancer patients. However, more large-scale and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of participants and interventions. Nantong, Jiangsu province, China, 2016
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary of Cochrane’s Risk of Bias. Nantong, Jiangsu province, China, 2016
Figure 3
Figure 3. The efficacy of nursing intervention on hope from baseline to posttest
Figure 4
Figure 4. The results of nursing interventions on hope, from baseline to follow-up

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duggleby W, Williams A, Wright K, Bollinger S. Renewing everyday hope the hope experience of family caregivers of persons with dementia. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009;30(8):514–521. doi: 10.1080/01612840802641727. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rustøen T, Wiklund I, Hanestad BR, Moum T. Nursing intervention to increase hope and quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 1998;21(4):235–245. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199808000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tokem Y, Ozcelik H, Cicik A. Examination of the Relationship Between Hopelessness Levels and Coping Strategies Among the Family Caregivers of Patients with Cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(4):E28–E34. doi: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000189. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herth K. Abbreviated instrument to measure hope development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17(10):1251–1259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rustøen T, Cooper BA, Miaskowski C. A longitudinal study of the effects of a hope intervention on levels of hope and psychological distress in a community-based sample of oncology patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15(4):351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.09.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types