Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0200759.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200759. eCollection 2018.

Optimization of fluorophores for chemical tagging and immunohistochemistry of Drosophila neurons

Geoffrey W Meissner  1 , Jonathan B Grimm  1 , Rebecca M Johnston  1 , Ben Sutcliffe  2 , Julian Ng  2 , Gregory S X E Jefferis  2 , Sebastian Cachero  2 , Luke D Lavis  1 , Oz Malkesman  1
Affiliations

Optimization of fluorophores for chemical tagging and immunohistochemistry of Drosophila neurons

Geoffrey W Meissner et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The use of genetically encoded 'self-labeling tags' with chemical fluorophore ligands enables rapid labeling of specific cells in neural tissue. To improve the chemical tagging of neurons, we synthesized and evaluated new fluorophore ligands based on Cy, Janelia Fluor, Alexa Fluor, and ATTO dyes and tested these with recently improved Drosophila melanogaster transgenes. We found that tissue clearing and mounting in DPX substantially improves signal quality when combined with specific non-cyanine fluorophores. We compared and combined this labeling technique with standard immunohistochemistry in the Drosophila brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Chemical tag ligands.
(A) JF549–CLIP-tag ligand. (B) ATTO 647N–HaloTag ligand. (C) Alexa Fluor 594–HaloTag ligand. (D) Cy2(Gly)–SNAP-tag ligand.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Comparison of brp-SNAP with JF549 or Cy2 SNAP-tag ligands.
brp-SNAP flies had brains removed, fixed, and incubated for 15 minutes with (A) Cy2 SNAP-tag ligand, or (B) JF549 SNAP-tag ligand. Cy2 samples had additional 4 hour 4% post-fixation, improving their morphology during dehydration and DPX mounting.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Comparison of Polarity IHC and chemical tag labeling methods.
All samples show the Drosophila left optic lobe imaged at 63X. Each image is independently scaled for optimal intensity. (A). Polarity pure IHC: Split GAL4 SS02565 was crossed to w;; 5XUAS-IVS-myr::smFLAG in VK00005, pJFRC51-3XUAS-IVS-Syt::smHA in su(Hw)attP1 and was labeled over a period of 13 days with nc82 mouse anti-Brp/Cy2 anti-mouse, rabbit anti-HA/Cy3 anti-rabbit, and rat anti-FLAG/Cy5 anti-rat. (B). Polarity hybrid IHC: SS02565 was crossed to w; brp-SNAP; 5XUAS-IVS-myr::smFLAG in VK00005, pJFRC51-3XUAS-IVS-Syt::smHA in su(Hw)attP1 and labeled with Cy2 SNAP-tag ligand for 15 minutes, followed by rabbit anti-HA/Cy3 anti-rabbit, and rat anti-FLAG/Cy5 anti-rat over 6 days. Arrowheads indicate bleed-through of Cy5 into Cy2 channel. (C). Polarity pure chemical tag: SS02565 was crossed to w; brp-SNAP; UAS-myr::4xCLIPf in VK00005, UAS-Syt::Halo7 in VK0027 and labeled for 15 minutes with Cy2 SNAP-tag ligand, TMR CLIP-tag ligand, and ATTO 647N HaloTag ligand. (D). Polarity ATTO 647N pure IHC: As in (A) but with ATTO 647N instead of Cy5. (E). Polarity ATTO 647N hybrid IHC: As in (B) but with ATTO 647N instead of Cy5.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Comparison of MCFO IHC and chemical tag labeling methods.
All samples show the Drosophila left optic lobe imaged at 63X. Each image is independently scaled for optimal intensity. Arrowheads indicate bleed-through into Cy2/AF488 channel. (A). MCFO pure IHC: Split GAL4 SS00313 was crossed to 57C10-Flp2 in attp18;; pJFRC201-10XUAS>STOP>myr::smGFP-HA in VK00005, pJFRC240-10XUAS>STOP>myr::smGFP-V5-THS-10XUAS>STOP>myr::smGFP-FLAG in su(Hw)attP1, and was labeled with nc82 mouse anti-Brp/Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse, rat anti-FLAG/Alexa Fluor 647 anti-rat, rabbit anti-HA/Alexa Fluor 594 anti-rabbit, and DyLight 550 mouse anti-V5 over a period of 7 days. (B). MCFO hybrid IHC: SS00313 was crossed to 57C10-Flp2 in attp18; brp-SNAP; pJFRC201-10XUAS>STOP>myr::smGFP-HA in VK00005, pJFRC240-10XUAS>STOP>myr::smGFP-V5-THS-10XUAS>STOP>myr::smGFP-FLAG in su(Hw)attP1 and labeled for 15 minutes with Cy2 SNAP-tag ligand, followed by rat anti-FLAG/Alexa Fluor 647 anti-rat, rabbit anti-HA/Alexa Fluor 594 anti-rabbit, and DyLight 550 mouse anti-V5 over a period of 6 days. (C). MCFO ATTO 647N pure IHC: As in (A) but with ATTO 647N instead of Alexa Fluor 647. (D). MCFO ATTO 647N hybrid IHC: As in (B) but with ATTO 647N instead of Alexa Fluor 647.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Detail comparison of SS02565 neuronal membrane labeling.
All samples show the same region of projections crossing from the left optic lobe to the central brain. Only the neuronal membrane channel is shown, and is labeled via antibodies in (A-B) and CLIP-tag in (C-D). (A) SS02565 was crossed to w;; 5XUAS-IVS-myr::smFLAG in VK00005, pJFRC51-3XUAS-IVS-Syt::smHA in su(Hw)attP1 and brains were labeled with pure IHC, including rat anti-FLAG and ATTO 647N goat anti-rat antibodies over a period of 13 days. (B) SS02565 was crossed to w; brp-SNAP; 5XUAS-IVS-myr::smFLAG in VK00005, pJFRC51-3XUAS-IVS-Syt::smHA in su(Hw)attP1 and brains were labeled with hybrid IHC, including rat anti-FLAG and ATTO 647N goat anti-rat antibodies over a period of 6 days. (C) SS02565 was crossed to w; brp-SNAP; UAS-myr::4xCLIPf in VK00005, UAS-Syt::Halo7 in VK0027 and brains were labeled for 15 minutes with pure chemical tags, including TMR CLIP-tag ligand. (D) SS02565 was crossed to w; brp-SNAP; UAS-myr::4xCLIPf in VK00005, UAS-Syt::Halo7 in VK0027 and brains were labeled for 15 minutes with pure chemical tags, including JF549 CLIP-tag ligand.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Comparison of reference and SS02565 neuronal membrane labeling.
(A) SS02565 was crossed to 20XUAS-Cs-Chrimson-mVenus trafficked in attP18 and brains were labeled with pure IHC over a period of 7 days.(B) SS02565 was crossed to 20XUAS-Cs-Chrimson-mVenus trafficked in attP18; brp-SNAP and brains were labeled with hybrid IHC over a period of 7 days.(C) SS02565 was crossed to brp-SNAP; UAS-7xHalo7::CAAX in VK0005 and brains were labeled for 15 minutes with pure chemical tags, including ATTO 647N HaloTag ligand. (D) SS02565 was crossed to brp-SNAP; UAS-myr-Halo2 in attP2 and brains were labeled for 15 minutes with pure chemical tags, including Alexa Fluor 594 HaloTag ligand.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Coons AH, Creech HJ, Jones RN, 1941. Immunological Properties of an Antibody Containing a Fluorescent Group. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1941; 47: 200–202.
    1. Erichsen JT, Reiner A, Karten HJ. Co-occurrence of substance P-like and Leu-enkephalin-like immunoreactivities in neurones and fibres of avian nervous system. Nature. 1982; 295: 407–10. - PubMed
    1. Mayersbach HV. Principles and limitations of immunohistochemical methods. J R Microsc Soc. 1967; 87: 295–308. - PubMed
    1. Matos LLd Trufelli DC, Matos MGLd Pinhal MAdS. Immunohistochemistry as an important tool in biomarkers detection and clinical practice. Biomark Insights. 2010; 5: 9–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SH, Shin YK, Lee KM, Lee JS, Yun JH, Lee SM. An improved protocol of biotinylated tyramine-based immunohistochemistry minimizing nonspecific background staining. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003; 51: 129–32. 10.1177/002215540305100116 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources