Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan-Dec:55:46958018787041.
doi: 10.1177/0046958018787041.

Four Needles in a Haystack: A Systematic Review Assessing Quality of Health Care in Specialty Practice by Practice Type

Shellie D Ellis  1 , Saleema A Karim  2 , Rachel R Vukas  1 , Daniel Marx  3 , Jalal Uddin  4
Affiliations

Four Needles in a Haystack: A Systematic Review Assessing Quality of Health Care in Specialty Practice by Practice Type

Shellie D Ellis et al. Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Specialists, who represent 60% of physicians in the United States, are consolidating into large group practices, but the degree to which group practice type facilitates the delivery of high quality of care in specialty settings is unknown. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify the impact of group practice type on the quality of care among specialty providers. The search resulted in 913 articles, of which only 4 met inclusion criteria. Studies were of moderate methodological quality. From the limited evidence available, we hypothesize that solo specialists deliver care that is inferior to their peers in group practice, whether measured by patient satisfaction ratings or adherence to guideline-based care. However, solo specialists and multidisciplinary group specialists may be more likely to provide some specialized services compared with their single-specialty group peers. Insufficient research compares quality of care among different practice types in specialty care. Substantial opportunity exists to test the degree to which organizational factors, whether size of practice or the mix of providers within the practice, influence quality of care in specialty settings.

Keywords: group practice; multispecialty; private practice; quality of health care; single specialty; solo practice; specialization; specialty; specialty care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual model of firm integration’s effects on quality.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PubMed search terms.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Search strategy and terminology.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Search results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Welch WP, Cuellar AE, Stearns SC, Bindman AB. Proportion of physicians in large group practices continued to grow in 2009-11. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(9):1659-1666. - PubMed
    1. Conti RM, Landrum MB, Jacobson M. The Impact of Provider Consolidation on Outpatient Prescription Drug-Based Cancer Care Spending. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health; 2016.
    1. Damiani G, Silvestrini G, Federico B, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of group versus single-handed practice. Health Policy. 2013;113(1-2):180-187. - PubMed
    1. Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians’ involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(3):843-853. - PubMed
    1. Kane CK, Emmons DW. Policy Research Perspectives: New Data on Physician Practice Arrangements: Private Practice Remains Strong Despite Shifts Toward Hospital Employment. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2013.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources