Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):1015.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5867-x.

Safer tattooing interventions in prisons: a systematic review and call to action

Nguyen Toan Tran  1   2 , Célestine Dubost  3 , Stéphanie Baggio  3 , Laurent Gétaz  3 , Hans Wolff  3
Affiliations

Safer tattooing interventions in prisons: a systematic review and call to action

Nguyen Toan Tran et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Worldwide more than ten million people are detained at any given time. Between 5 and 60% of people experiencing incarceration report receipt of a tattoo in prison - mostly clandestine, which is associated with risks of blood-borne infections (BBIs). Although safer tattooing techniques are effective in preventing BBI transmission and available to the general population, there is limited knowledge about the impact of safer tattooing strategies in prisons in terms of health outcomes, changes in knowledge and behaviors, and best practice models for implementation. The objective of this research was to identify and review safer tattooing interventions.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature. Studies of all design types were included if they were published until 27 June 2018, the population was incarcerated adults, they reported quantitative outcomes, and were published in English, French, or Spanish.

Results: Of 55 papers retrieved from the initial search, no peer-reviewed article was identified. One paper from the grey literature described a multi-site pilot project in Canada. Its evaluation suggested that the project was effective in enhancing knowledge of incarcerated people and prison staff on standard precautions, had the potential to reduce harm, provided vocational opportunities, and was feasible although enhancements were needed to improve implementation issues and efficiency.

Conclusions: Although access to preventive services, including to safer tattooing interventions, is a human right and recommended by United Nations agencies as part of a comprehensive package of harm reduction interventions in prisons, this review identified only a few promising strategies for safer tattooing interventions in carceral settings. We call upon governments, criminal justice authorities, non-governmental organizations, and academic institutions to implement safer tattooing projects that adhere to the following guiding principles: i) integration of methodologically-rigorous implementation research; ii) involvement of key stakeholders (incarcerated people, prison authorities, research partners) in the project design, implementation, and research; iii) integration into a comprehensive package of BBI prevention, treatment, and care, using a stepwise approach that considers local resources and acceptability; and iv) publication and dissemination of findings, and scaling up efforts.

Prospero registration: CRD42017072502 .

Keywords: Call to action; Detention; Harm reduction; Human rights; Prison; Safer tattooing; Stepwise approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2008 Flow Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Model of a stepwise approach to safer tattooing in prison settings, according to time (x axis) and resources and acceptability from authorities (y axis)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Walmsley R. Institute for Criminal Policy Research. 2016. World prison brief.
    1. Abiona TC, Balogun JA, Adefuye AS, Sloan PE. Body art practices among inmates: implications for transmission of bloodborne infections. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(2):121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poulin C, Courtemanche Y, Serhir B, Alary M. Tattooing in prison: a risk factor for HCV infection among inmates in the Quebec's provincial correctional system. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(4):231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hellard ME, Aitken CK, Hocking JS. Tattooing in prisons - not such a pretty picture. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(7):477–480. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler T, Richters J, Yap L, Papanastasiou C, Richards A, Schneider K, Grant L, Smith A, Donovan B. Sexual health and behaviour of Queensland prisoners with Queensland and New South Wales comparisons. Perth and Sydney: National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, and School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; 2010.

Publication types

MeSH terms